Obama First to Win SMB Group's Endorsement

News

Obama First to Win SMB Group's Endorsement

By Keith Girard
Allbusiness.com
February 26, 2008

The American Small Business League (ASBL) has become the first small business advocacy group to endorsed a presidential candidate -- Sen. Barack Obama.

ABSL founder and President Lloyd Chapmpan has waged a concerted campaign to force contracting reforms at the Small Business Administration, which has been rocked by a series of scandas during the Bush Administration. The ABSL sued the agency earlier this month for refusing to identify corporations that are receiving small business contracts

Since 2002, a series of federal investigations have found that billions of dollars in federal small business contracts have actually wound up in the hands of some of the largest corporations in the world. Sen. Obama's record of rising above the influence of big business lobbying and his commitment to small businesses make him the best candidate to end dramatic abuses in federal small business contracting.

"I am so tired of being disappointed by our elected officials. For the first time in many years I am genuinely excited about this election. In my life, I have never been more excited about any politician than I am about Barack Obama," said Chapman.

"Helping American small business is part of our movement for change, and the end of politics as usual," Sen. Obama said in response to the endorsement. "Over half of all Americans work for a small business. Small businesses are the backbone of our nation's economy and we must protect this great resource. It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants."





SBA National Ombudsman Mandates High Level Review of ASBL Testimony

Press Release

SBA National Ombudsman Mandates High Level Review of ASBL Testimony

February 12, 2008

Petaluma, Calif. –  In response to testimony by American Small Business League (ASBL) Communications Director Chris Gunn during a February 5, 2008 hearing on regulatory fairness, Small Business Administration (SBA) National Ombudsman Nicholas Owens has referred the ASBL’s concerns to the SBA Office of Government Contracting and Business Development for a high level review and response.
 
The ASBL’s testimony highlighted a need for more enforcement of regulations currently on the books. These regulations, which were designed to prevent the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations and their subsidiaries are not being enforced, according to Gunn.
 
Specifically, during his testimony Gunn referred to Section 5 of the Small Business Act of 1953 (15 U.S.C. 637 (d)(3)(C)), which states, “Misrepresentation of any concern or person as a small business concern is punishable by a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.” Every year, billions of dollars in federal small business contracts are unlawfully diverted from legitimate small businesses to large corporations. Yet, to date, no fines or punishments have been levied against offending parties.
 
The ASBL estimates that every year more than $100 billion in federal small business contracts are diverted from legitimate small businesses to some of the largest corporations in the United States and Europe.
 
“Despite the regulations set in place in the Small Business Act, which were designed for the purposes of preventing the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations, misrepresentation in federal small business contracting is still taking place,” Gunn stated during his testimony.
 
In Report 5-15, the SBA Office of the Inspector General stated, “One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the entire Federal Government today is that large businesses are receiving small business procurement awards and agencies are receiving credit for these awards.”
 
“The bottom line is that the SBA is not enforcing current regulations and then fabricates the small business goaling report to give the outward impression that the federal government is nearly hitting its 23 percent goal,” President and Founder of the ASBL, Lloyd Chapman said. “We believe that with effective solutions like annual re-certification, the Fairness and Transparency in Contacting Act of 2008, and the enforcement of current regulations, we can make huge strides towards the removal of large firms from the small business contracting.”
 
The ASBL expects the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act of 2008 to be introduced shortly.
 
 ###

Small Business Administration Sued For Refusing to Release Contracting Data

Press Release

Small Business Administration Sued For Refusing to Release Contracting Data

SBA sued by the American Small Business League for withholding data on billions of dollars in contracting abuses

February 6, 2008

Petaluma, Calif. –  Today the American Small Business League filed their 4th federal lawsuit against the Small Business Administration (SBA) in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The lawsuit was filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) over the SBA's refusal to release the names of Fortune 1000 firms that received billions of dollars in Federal small business contracts during 2005 and 2006.
 
Since 2003, more than a dozen federal investigations uncovered the fact that some of the largest corporations in the United States and Europe were the actual recipients of billions of dollars in federal small business contracts.
 
Under FOIA, the ASBL requested the specific names of all firms that were coded by the federal government as small businesses for FY 2005 and FY 2006. Despite more than 400 stories in mainstream media across the nation documenting the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations, the SBA consistently refuses to release the names of Fortune 1000 corporations and other large businesses that received federal small business contracts.
 
In addition to the federal investigations, investigative stories by organizations including CBS, ABC and CNN found that firms such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Halliburton, Bechtel, Microsoft, Wal-Mart, GTSI, Hewlett Packard, L-3 Communications and Rolls-Royce were the actual recipients of billions of dollars in federal small business contracts.
 
“In his recent State of the SBA speech, SBA administrator Steven Preston stated that he was a strong proponent of transparency in federal government,” President of the American Small Business League Lloyd Chapman said. “However, since his appointment Mr. Preston has: removed the data from the government’s database (CCR) that the public could use to determine if a company is small or large; adopted a policy that allows Fortune 1000 corporations to continue to receive federal small business contracts through 2012; refused to implement the congressionally mandated small business program for women-owned firms; and refused to release the names of the firms that the SBA reported as small businesses for the purpose of meeting the Federal government’s small business procurement goal.”
 
During 2007, the SBA attempted to cover-up the diversion of federal small business contracts by issuing their Myth v. Fact press release. In the release, the SBA stated that it was a myth that large businesses received federal small business contracts. However, with the release of the SBA’s “Top 100 Report”, Preston acknowledged that large businesses had received federal small business contracts, a blatant contradiction of the SBA’s earlier press releases.
 
“I am sure that we will win this lawsuit.” Chapman said. “I want people to know that when the government diverts $100 billion a year in contracts from middle class America, there is a staggering negative economic impact. I don’t think there is any question that the Bush Administration’s anti-small business policies have been a contributing factor to our nation’s current economic woes.”
 
Within the next 60 days, the ASBL plans to file similar lawsuits against the Pentagon and the General Services Administration.
 
 

Super Tuesday: Keeping Small Business in Check

News

Super Tuesday: Keeping Small Business in Check

By Justin Petruccelli
Entrepreneur.com
February 6, 2008

In 1992, a struggling economy was the main issue as Bill Clinton unseated George H. W. Bush. Sixteen years later, with Bush’s son in the White House and Clinton’s wife vying to replace him, it’s still "the economy, stupid." So where do this year’s remaining presidential candidates stand on the issues that matter most to small business owners?

The American Small Business League has expressed displeasure with the candidates' perceived lack of attention to small business issues. However, although the candidates may not directly address small businesses, their stances on health care and tax reform could affect small business in the future.

Both Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama favor a general overhaul of the healthcare system that would move toward coverage for all Americans. They would do so by requiring all businesses to either provide medical insurance or chip in for its cost. Clinton hasn't specified what sized company qualifies as a small business, but would give tax incentives for businesses that provide coverage. Obama has defined a small business as one with 15 or fewer employees and also favors an exemption.

On the Republican side, common threads include tax incentives and deregulation of insurance companies. Sen. John McCain proposed policies that would control health-care costs and provide assistance for the self-employed. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s proposed policies would provide block grants to individual states so that each could provide market-based medical coverage.

Of course, no discussion of business and politics would be complete without taxes. Most of the noise on this issue has been made by the GOP candidates. Romney favors lower taxes across the board, including the elimination of estate tax as well as those on capital gains, interest and dividends. McCain opposed both the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts but then voted to extend them through 2010. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, whose wins in the South have him hanging on for now, wants to dissolve the IRS altogether and go to a national sales tax system on all new retail goods.


Advocacy group sues SBA

News

Advocacy group sues SBA

By Michael Hardy
Washington Technology
February 6, 2008

A small-business advocacy group has sued the Small Business Administration, claiming the agency is withholding information on contracting abuses.

The American Small Business League, in a suit filed today in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that the agency has refused its requests to identify Fortune 1000 companies that got small-business contracts in 2005 and 2006.

The ASBL has filed Freedom of Information Act requests asking SBA to release the names of all firms listed as small businesses in those years. The group says SBA has refused to do so.

Several investigations have revealed that large companies sometimes reap the benefits of small-business set-aside contracts. In early 2005, SBA officials released a 2004 report showing that $2 billion of the $50.8 billion earmarked for small businesses in fiscal 2002 did not get to them. The study found that of the top 1,000 businesses receiving federal small-business set-aside contracts in 2002, 44 were not small businesses.

In the past, companies could acquire small businesses and agencies could continue to count contracts they held with the small businesses as contributing to their small-business contracting goals. A new rule that went into effect in 2007 requires the small firms to recertify their size after being acquired. If the firms no longer qualify as small, agencies lose the credit and have the option of terminating the contract.

Other possible reasons for the mis-spending of small business dollars include using incorrect industry codes and deliberate fraud. The system SBA uses to determine whether a business is small is complicated, and efforts to simplify it have so far not been successul.

ASBL believes SBA officials are concealing information that would illuminate the full scope of the problem. The new lawsuit is the fourth that the organization has filed seeking to force the release of information.

“I am sure that we will win this lawsuit,” ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said. “I want people to know that when the government diverts $100 billion a year in contracts from middle-class America, there is a staggering negative economic impact. I don’t think there is any question that the Bush administration’s anti-small-business policies have been a contributing factor to our nation’s current economic woes.”

The group plans to file similar lawsuits against the Defense Department and the General Services Administration in the next couple of months.

"We don't know anything about this lawsuit. We haven't seen it yet," said an SBA spokeswoman. "What we do know is there are two government run public web sites that provide this" information.

The sites are the Federal Procurement Data System at http://fpdsng.gov, and http://usaspending.gov.

Source:  http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/32204-1.html