Obama Drops Windfall Profits Tax for Oil and Gas Industry

Press Release

Obama Drops Windfall Profits Tax for Oil and Gas Industry

Obama Backs Down from Promise to Institute Windfall Profits Tax

December 2, 2008

Petaluma, Calif. – President-elect Barack Obama has removed any reference of his promise to implement a windfall profits tax on the oil and gas industry from the Obama-Biden Transition Team website, www.change.gov.

During the course of the 2008 presidential election, the Obama campaign called for a windfall profits tax on the oil industry as a means of subsidizing a $1,000 "emergency" rebate for consumers struggling with surging gas prices.  However www.change.gov, which houses the Obama-Biden transition agenda, was recently cleansed of any mention of such a tax. 

The promise was displayed prominently at the top of the “economy” section of Obama’s campaign website.  That same information was transferred to Obama’s transition website, www.change.gov, when it was launched on Thursday, November 6th.  However, the language regarding the windfall profits tax was removed on Saturday, November 8th in an unceremonious and abrupt manner. (pre-change, https://www.asbl.com/documents/Economy_Change.pdf ; post-change, http://change.gov/agenda/economy_agenda/ )

While on the campaign trail, Obama made provocative statements regarding the cost of energy and its respective negative impact on American families.  On May 6, 2008, Obama stated, “It isn't right that oil companies are making record profits at a time when ordinary Americans are going into debt trying to pay rising energy costs. That's why we'll put a windfall profits tax on oil companies and use it to help Indiana families pay their heating and cooling bills and reduce energy costs.” (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/25/barackobama.uselections20081)

With the election behind him, President-elect Obama has failed to justify the removal of the windfall profits tax from his tax plan.  The subtle and unexplained elimination of this issue from the Obama-Biden agenda should concern Americans from every background.  The American Small Business League (ASBL) questions whether the sudden elimination of this issue is a further indication that large corporations are already demonstrating their ability to influence the Obama Administration. (www.asbl.com)

“This is not the only campaign promise the Obama-Biden Transition Team has removed from change.gov; I believe that President-elect Obama owes the American people an explanation as to why these campaign promises have been pulled from his agenda.”  American Small Business League President Lloyd Chapman said.  “With that in mind, someone from the mainstream media needs to ask President-elect Obama why these policies have been dropped.”

-###-



Forbes: Let the Small Business Administration work

News

Forbes: Let the Small Business Administration work

By Michael P. Forbes
Austin American Statesman
December 1, 2008

As President-elect Barack Obama hunkers down with the brightest minds in the country to craft a plan to restore market stability, economic growth and national confidence, federal programs already exist that, with renewed interest and only a modest investment, could help lead us out of our worst recession in 80 years.

The U.S. Small Business Administration is a proven federal enterprise whose programs are fully capable of stimulating local economies around the country. Unfortunately, disdain for the SBA by the Bush administration — compounded by the diversion of funds to finance the Iraq war — siphoned off discretionary dollars in the federal budget. As a result, many SBA programs are on life support.

Tried and true incentives have been among the hardest hit during the past eight years. They include SBA loan guarantees, access to federal contracts for small businesses and business development assistance.

Small businesses are the source of half of all the nation's private sector employees and contribute more than 50 percent of U.S. non-farm gross domestic product. Yet, at $463 million this year, the SBA budget is less than half that of what it was during the last year of the Clinton administration ($1.1 billion in 2000).

The SBA reports a 30 percent drop over the past year in the number of loans it has issued, and a 13 percent decline — from $20.6 billion to $17.96 billion — in dollars borrowed. This continues a trend of annual declines under the Bush administration, the likes of which were last seen in the early 1970s.

As the premier advocate for mom-and-pop businesses, the SBA can provide the biggest bang for our buck in jobs preserved and jobs created.

Here's what we need to do:

• Breathe new life into SBA-guaranteed, private-sector lending. Federal help to financial institutions under the $700 billion bailout package should be tied to an ironclad pledge by banks to dedicate a sizable percentage — say, a minimum 25 percent of their loan capacity — to small businesses. If lending institutions use the SBA guarantee program, they will have minimal risk as these loans will be secured by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

• Transfer $5 billion of the $700 billion for other SBA investments: infrastructure, local brick-and-mortar initiatives, and support for veterans, women and minority-owned small businesses. These chronically underserved sectors of the economy are disproportionately impacted in a downturn.

• Invoke an "emergency powers" approach to the crisis, as is done in the event of natural disasters, and immediately roll back the punishing increases in SBA lending fees. Eliminate deleterious auditing assessments and other disincentives imposed on lenders and borrowers. In addition, the byzantine application process must be streamlined. Finally, extended payback terms should be allowed during this period of economic uncertainty.

• Facilitate sales by small businesses to the largest purchaser of goods and services — the United States government. The SBA needs tough enforcement mechanisms to reverse the big-business bias at government agencies — the departments of Defense and Justice are big offenders — that systematically ignore goals to reserve more than 23 percent of federal purchases for small firms. Loopholes must be closed on large businesses that acquire small firms holding multiyear contracts designated for small businesses. All federal dollars linked to contracts issued to small enterprises should be re-bid if those firms are acquired.

• New emphasis must be placed on the SBA's Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program, its nationwide network of 1,100 Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs) and the Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) mentor program. SBICs route private venture capital to worthy small enterprises. SCORE, with its retired business professionals and university-based SBDCs provide one-on-one counseling to those with the raw talent but not necessarily the acumen needed to navigate the challenges that start-ups inevitably face.

A reinvestment in the neglected Small Business Administration and an expansion of its already viable programs will yield positive results sooner rather than later, restore confidence on Main Street and underscore for the nation's last pioneers — job-creating entrepreneurs – that the incoming administration understands that a robust small business community advances the promise that is America.

Forbes, who lives in Round Rock, is a former New York congressman and a past senior official at the U.S. Small Business Administration.

 

Source:  http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/