Senate touts commitment to small businesses

News

Senate touts commitment to small businesses

By Staff
Capital Solutions Bancorp
May 19, 2009

Some small businesses and industry advocates have voiced frustration with the Obama administration's perceived inattention to the needs of small businesses around the country - particularly those struggling to manage cash flow and secure new government funded projects.

The American Small Business League is one small business advocate group that has made its concerns known - saying that stimulus funds were geared too much toward large corporations and that big companies may now be able to vie for contracts intended for small firms.

Many small businesses have turned to alternative lenders during the financial crisis when lines of credit were cut at traditional banks.

But a new statement from the Democratic Policy Committee reviews the work the Democratic-led Senate has done to benefit small businesses as well as the steps that are planned for the future.

Among their actions, says the Democratic Policy Committee, is a boost in funding for the Small Business Administration in the 2010 budget after the group had experienced cuts over the last few years.

The group also says it has made funds available to support even the smallest businesses with microloans.





Source:  http://capitalsolutionsbancorp.com/news/senate-touts-commitment-to-small-businesses-20090519

Stimulus Aid Trickles Out, but States Seek Quicker Relief

News

Stimulus Aid Trickles Out, but States Seek Quicker Relief

By Michael Cooper
New York Times
May 12, 2009

Nearly three months after President Obama approved a $787 billion economic stimulus package, intended to create or save jobs, the federal government has paid out less than 6 percent of the money, largely in the form of social service payments to states.

Although administration officials say the program is right on schedule, they have actually spent relatively little so far.

The stimulus bill has directly injected around $45.6 billion into the economy, mostly to help states cover the costs of Medicaid and unemployment benefits, one-time $250 checks that were mailed to Social Security recipients last week, and income tax cuts that began to take effect this spring.

Although states around the country are beginning roadwork projects, the Department of Transportation had spent only about $11 million on highway projects through the first week of May.

The intent of the stimulus program was to pump money into the economy quickly, and many members of Congress said at the time of its passage that speed was of the essence. But the huge program has been a challenge to administer for both a new administration and for states and local governments grappling with their own fiscal problems.

Some states and cities are beginning to complain that the money has yet to reach them. Others have been slow to get their paperwork to Washington; Virginia has yet to send the Transportation Department its list of road projects.

At the same time, some economists have questioned the administration’s claims that the bill has saved or created 150,000 jobs.

Obama administration officials, however, say the pace of the stimulus program is on schedule, and even if the federal checks are not yet in the mail the effects of the stimulus are beginning to reverberate: the promise of the federal money has been enough to get states to start construction work and to retain some jobs that were in jeopardy.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who writes in a report on the stimulus bill to be released this week that it remains “ahead of schedule in most programs,” said in a telephone interview Tuesday that the bill was helping people grapple with the recession, getting money to the states and into the economy, and laying a foundation for long-term aspirations like high-speed rail.

“We’re 85 days into a two-year program here — we’re trying to get the money out as quickly as we can, but not too quickly, so we don’t end up really screwing up here,” Mr. Biden said. “Because we’re talking about big dollars here, these are big numbers, this is unprecedented. And in 85 days we’ve gotten tens of billions of dollars out the door, and so far — knock on wood — no real big problems, no real big glitches.”

The Transportation Department has committed to pay for more than $10.5 billion worth of projects across the country, which an official there likened to signing the paperwork for a new car before the check has cleared.

Those commitments have spurred at least 20 states to award contracts and begin paying road crews; some contractors are staffing up, or postponing layoffs, in the hopes of winning some of that work.

And the federal I.O.U.’s — the government has made $88 billion worth of commitments so far — have saved jobs in many areas.

Columbus, Ohio, which sent layoff notices to its entire class of 26 police recruits in January, decided to rehire the class in February when it learned it would get a Justice Department grant.

Alabama plans to keep 3,800 teachers whose jobs were in jeopardy, knowing that education stimulus money will soon be on its way.

Utah is planning to rehire or retain about 45 probation and parole agents, court clerks, crime lab technicians, investigators and counselors on the promise of expected stimulus aid.

Nonetheless, to the frustration of some local governments, the federal spigot has been more trickle than flood, and states are facing such fiscal pressure that many are cutting jobs anyway.

When the Senate recently held a hearing on the spending of the stimulus money, Ray Scheppach, the executive director of the National Governors Association, told lawmakers that “to one extent this hearing is premature.” He reminded them that most of the stimulus funds “remain in the hands of the federal government.”

When the bill was still in Congress, the need for speed was so important that the Obama administration agreed to funnel much of the money through existing programs to accelerate the process. The bill’s Republican opponents questioned the bill’s short-term effects, seizing on a Congressional Budget Office report that found that much of the spending would be pushed into later years.

Now, a federal government that has often been caricatured as profligate has begun trying to spend money as quickly as possible and has become fixated, to use the new Washington catch phrase, with “getting money out the door.”

The Obama administration has committed to spending 70 percent of the money, or $550.9 billion, within the first two years. By that benchmark, an administration official said, the government is 8 percent toward its goal.

There has been skepticism of the administration’s claim of creating or saving 150,000 jobs. While it can be difficult to count jobs that were saved, as opposed to those that were created, Peter Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland, said that trends in state and local government employment “just do not support that claim.” Other economists have been more supportive of the administration.

Mr. Biden said the stimulus had created some public works jobs, generated work at factories that expect to benefit from the work and kept many state and local governments from laying off workers, since stimulus aid will help them balance their budgets.

But getting the money out can be a cumbersome process at times. Virginia, the last state to submit a list of transportation projects, is trying to get the work done as its Transportation Department is shedding 1,000 positions. Jeffrey Caldwell, a State Transportation Department spokesman, said that the agency had sought bids on some of the jobs anyway, so work could begin quickly when the list was done.

Last week, the government reported spending more than $10 billion in stimulus money, and officials said that the speed would increase as the program grows.

“In baseball terms, I think there’s going to be real pace on the ball here,” Mr. Biden said in the interview. “I think that what you’re going to see happen here is the velocity of this will increase not just arithmetically, but geometrically here. At least, we’ve got to make that happen.”

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/us/politics/13stimulus.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

Small Business Contracting Scandal Celebrates its 6-Year Anniversary

Press Release

Small Business Contracting Scandal Celebrates its 6-Year Anniversary

May 7, 2009

Petaluma, Calif. - The American Small Business League (ASBL) has sent six separate cakes to: the Administrator of the Small Business Administration Karen Mills, the chair and ranking member of both the House and Senate small business committees, and the former Chair of the House Committee on Small Business, Rep. Donald Manzullo (R - IL).

Each cake has been decorated with, "Happy 6th anniversary small business contracting fraud." A note with each cake says:

"It's now been 6 years since the first congressional hearing on the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations and there has been no legislation. Why? Support the American Small Business League's Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act."

The ASBL is hoping to bring attention to the fact that although the first hearing on the diversion of federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms was held six years ago, no legislation has been passed to address the abuses.
 
Since 2003, a series of over a dozen federal investigations have all found that every year billions of dollars in federal small business contracts actually wind up in the hands of Fortune 500 firms.

The ASBL estimates over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts are diverted to large businesses.
 
During the 2008 Presidential election, President Barack Obama stated, "It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants." (http://www.barackobama.com/2008/02/26/the_american_small_business_le.php)

President Obama has consistently refused to adopt any legislation or policy to honor his campaign promise.
 
The ASBL has drafted, "The Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act," which it believes could create millions of jobs in America by stopping the flow of federal small business contracts to large businesses and redirecting those funds to middle class firms. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, firms with less than 20 employees account for 90 percent of all U.S. firms and are responsible for more than 97 percent of all new jobs in America.
 
"It's been 6 years since this issue was uncovered. As America sinks deeper and deeper into an economic recession, it's time for President Obama to do what he said he was going to do during the campaign, and end the diversion of federal contracts earmarked for middle class firms to corporate giants," ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said.

-###-

Small-Business Groups Give Obama's First 100 Days Mixed Review



News


Small-Business Groups Give Obama's First 100 Days Mixed Review


By Kelly Spors


Wall Street Journal




April 29, 2009


Many small-business owners and the groups that represent them were initially leery about Barack Obama’s presidency and how he would help them. How do they feel 100 days into it? Did he dash, meet or exceed expectations when it comes to helping small-business owners in this bleak economy?


Since taking office, President Obama introduced several initiatives or proposals with direct or indirect effects on small businesses, ranging from funneling stimulus money into Small Business Administration loan programs, pushing health-care reform, funding alternative energy and job creation projects and prodding banks to unfreeze credit. Of course, businesses may also benefit from the massive stimulus package by winning government contracts and the expected business it will spur.


A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows the new president is broadly popular among the American populace, and has so far produced an upswing in national confidence.


Still, many business advocacy groups – which tend to lean Republican – aren’t nearly as impressed. They feel the new president has burdened them with extra regulations, such as requiring they extend COBRA benefits, without providing financial relief such as tax breaks. “Unfortunately, small business owners largely believe that Washington just keeps cranking out more ways to abscond their limited time, capital and resources,” says Karen Kerrigan, executive director of the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, a lobby group, in a news release. “We hope that in the next 100 days and beyond, President Obama will turn to entrepreneurs for ideas that will reduce their government-imposed costs and burdens, solutions that will help them maintain and grow their workforce, and options for providing affordable health coverage.”


Other groups with more focused agendas also don’t feel he’s done enough to help small firms. Lloyd Chapman, The American Small Business League, a group that follows small-business contracting, says President Obama reneged on his campaign-trail promise to ensure small businesses win their share of government contracts.”You have come out with numerous small business rescue plans and stimulus plans, and yet today small businesses in all 50 states are still having to compete with “corporate giants” for even the most minuscule government small business contracts for goods and services,” Mr. Chapman wrote to Mr. Obama on ExceptionMag.com.


Yet, others are more tempered in their reviews, even complimentary. Todd McCracken, president of the National Small Business Association said in a phone interview this morning that he’s happy President Obama has put unionization “card-check” reform on the backburner and pushed credit-card reform and reviving SBA lending to the forefront. Mr. McCracken would have liked to have seen the SBA administrator elevated to a cabinet post, which hasn’t happened. The big test in his mind, however, is yet to come: Whether President Obama can push through health-care reform that’s agreeable to business owners. NSBA wants reform that mandates that individuals buy health coverage but that doesn’t mandate that employers buy it. “I think all in all he has shown that he’s willing to be pragmatic,” Mr. McCracken says. “He sees that small business is really good for the economy… I think we’ve actually seen a growing realization of this over the last 100 days.”


Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/independentstreet/2009/04/29/small-business-groups-give-obamas-first-100-days-mixed-review/