Government Falls Short of Small Business Contracting Goals

News

Government Falls Short of Small Business Contracting Goals

Small firms won a record amount in government contracts last year, but it wasn't enough to reach a target set by Congress.

By Courtney Rubin
Inc.com
August 31, 2010

Small businesses nationwide won a record $96.8 billion in federal contracts last year, an increase of more than $3 billion over fiscal 2008, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration's most recent scorecard. However, it still wasn't enough to reach a goal set by Congress.

Small business contracts accounted for 21.9 percent of federal spending last year – up from 21.5 percent the year before. Congress set a goal of 23 percent goal.

"There was an increase in both dollars and contracting share for every small-business category," SBA Administrator Karen Mills said in a statement. "This represents real progress, but not enough. We must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23 percent [of all federal spending] goal is met and exceeded."

The work small businesses did included scientific research, technological support -- and even janitorial services.

By law, the government must keep tabs on its efforts to offer contracts to businesses in five categories: small businesses overall, women-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and HUB Zone businesses, or those in historically underutilized business zones (economically distressed areas).

Of those categories, only one – small disadvantaged businesses – exceeded its goal for fiscal year 2009. Its contracts made up 7.6 percent of all federal funding in 2009, or $33.5 billion. The category's goal was 5 percent. "Disadvantaged" companies are those owned by people who have had economic disadvantages and are members of certain ethnic and racial groups.

Last year, the government awarded $16.3 billion in contracts (3.4 percent of federal spending) to small companies owned by women. That's $1.6 billion more than in 2008 but still short of the 5 percent goal.

The scorecard grades the efforts of 24 agencies. The overall federal government received a B.

The Energy, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs department – and the SBA itself – received top marks. The Office of Personnel Management, Agency for International Development, and the National Science Foundation earned failing grades.

In comments attached to the scorecard, poorly ranked agencies justified their low marks. The General Services Administration, which received a C, noted that its goal for small business contracts was 35.7 percent, much higher than that for the entire federal government. (27 percent of GSA contracts went to small businesses.) Just 8 percent of USAID's contract dollars went to small businesses – earning the agency a failing grade – but that's because the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief required it to buy a lot of drugs, the agency said.

The American Small Business League, a California-based advocacy group that has previously accused the government of misrepresentation, challenged the SBA figures. According to the league's June analysis of the top 100 recipients of federal business contracts in fiscal 2009, some 65 percent of the money went to large companies that in some cases were members of the Fortune 500. Based on that sample, the proportion of contract dollars going to small business is closer to 5 percent, the league said Monday.

-###-

U.S. small-business spending disputed

News

U.S. small-business spending disputed

By Jan Norman
OC Register
August 31, 2010

The federal government spent a record $96.8 billion with U.S. small businesses in the 2009 fiscal year, according to an annual report from the U.S. Small Business Administration.

However, a major critic of federal small-business contracting calls the report "dramatically inflated."

However, the report is flawed in two ways, according to Lloyd Chapman, president of the American Small Business League in Petaluma. He claims:

    * It includes billions of dollars in contracts that actually went to large corporations.

    * The calculations are based on $500 billion in spending when the real federal acquisition budget is $1 trillion.

 

The SBA acknowledges that the federal government missed its goal for small-business spending in four of the five categories, but in each category the spending increased.

SBA Administrator Karen Mills said the report "represents real progress, but not enough. We must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23% goal is met and exceeded."

Chapman said that his organization had analyzed 2009 small-business contracting data and found "the actual percentage of contracts awarded to small businesses is closer to 5%...Of the top 100 recipients of federal small-0business contracts...60 large firms received 64.5% of the total dollars the government claimed to have awarded to small business.

"The ASBL also identified a series of Fortune 500 corporations and other large firms in the government's 2009 contracting data...including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace, Northrop Grumman, General Elect4ric, Booz Allen Hamilton, Thales Communications, General Dynamics and Dell Computer," Chapman added.

There’s no legal requirement to give contracts to small businesses, but since 1953, the federal government has encouraged its biggest agencies to spend some money with the little guys that account for half the nation’s gross domestic product, more than half the jobs and more than half the net NEW jobs.

Chapman has been insisting for years — through the administrations of both political parties — that these reports are at best mistaken and at worst fraudulent and involve “$100 billion a year.” He created the league to call public attention to the issue.

In the past, the SBA has attributed the issue to data-entry mistakes, to companies winning contracts while they were small but then outgrowing the limit and to multi-year contracts automatically renewed for as long a s 20 years if a business did a good job.

It’s not that the definition of a small business is so restrictive.  In some industry categories, a company can have 1,500 employees or $35.5 million in annual revenues.

Source: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/small-264417-business-report.html

Some Skeptical Of SBA Numbers

News

Some Skeptical Of SBA Numbers

Business leader says government contracts meant for small businesses went to large companies

By Resources for Entrepreneurs Staff
Gaebler.com Resources for Entrepreneurs
August 31, 2010

While many were likely pleased when the U.S. Small Business Administration announced that the federal government had given away $96.8 billion in contracts to small businesses, some were not so sure that the numbers were accurate.

One of the biggest critics was Lloyd Chapman, president of the American Small Business League in Petaluma, California. The OC Register reports that Chapman called the statistics from the SBA "dramatically inflated," because much of the money ended up going to some of the largest corporations in the country.

He also disputed the SBA's finding that 23 percent of federal contracts went to small businesses, saying that his group had done studies proving that the numbers were based on false findings.

"The ASBL also identified a series of Fortune 500 corporations and other large firms in the government's 2009 contracting data... including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace, Northrop Grumman," Chap said in an interview with the news source.

The head of the SBA, Karen Mills, recently gave an interview to USA Today in which she said that her agency was trying hard to cut down on abuses of the system. "We are closing down on fraud, waste and abuse," she told the newspaper regarding the news for small business. "We're making sure that those who are supposed to be certified in the program are small businesses - that they are who they are supposed to be."

Source: http://www.gaebler.com/News/Small-Business-Finance/Some-skeptical-of-SBA-numbers-19934061.htm

Business group president says government not accurate in small business spending

News

Business group president says government not accurate in small business spending

By Derek McAllister
123 Print
August 31, 2010

The president of the American Small Business League in Petaluma, California, is taking issue with statistics released by the federal government when it comes to small business spending.

The Orange Country Register reports that ASBL president Lloyd Chapman disputed the government's assertion that it had given $96.8 billion in federal contracts to small business owners around the country in 2009. Chapman said that much of the money the government claimed went to small businesses ended up going to large, multi-national corporations.

While the U.S. Small Business Administration claimed that a record 23 percent of federal contracts went to small businesses, according to the the ASBL, "the actual percentage of contracts awarded to small businesses is closer to 5 percent ... Of the top 100 recipients of federal small business contracts ... 60 large firms received 64.5 percent of the total dollars the government claimed to have awarded to small business," the news source quoted the group as saying.

In a recent statement, the ASBL was largely critical of the current president's use of government money. "Not only has the Obama Administration shortchanged small businesses with stimulus funds," the group wrote in a letter to Ben Bernanke, "but also information released by the Obama Administration clearly shows that every month President [Barack] Obama has been in office, billions of dollars in small business contracts are being diverted to large businesses."

Source: http://www.123print.com/News/Business-group-president-says-government-not-accurate-in-small-business-spending-776





An Open Letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke from American Small Business League President Lloyd Chapman

Press Release

An Open Letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke from American Small Business League President Lloyd Chapman

August 31, 2010

Petaluma, Calif. – I read your speech from Friday at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. In the speech you stated, “the Committee is prepared to provide additional monetary accommodation through unconventional measures if it proves necessary, especially if the outlook were to deteriorate significantly.” (http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20100827a.htm)  

It appears we are sliding into another recession and I have a simple suggestion that will redirect more money into the middle class and create more jobs than any policy proposal the Obama Administration has put forth to date. Since you acknowledged that you are willing to take extraordinary measures, why doesn’t the Obama Administration consider not giving federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms, foreign companies and other large businesses? I realize that you control monetary policy, but as the nation’s chief economist, and as one who advocates for fiscal policy, you could have an impact on this issue.

In March of 2005, the Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Inspector General released Report 5-15, which states, “One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire Federal government today is that large businesses are receiving small business procurement awards and agencies are receiving credit for these awards.” (https://www.asbl.com/documents/05-15.pdf) The SBA Inspector General has listed this problem as the number one management challenge facing the agency for the past five consecutive years. (http://www.sba.gov/ig/onlinelibrary/tmc/index.html)  

Since 2003, there have been over a dozen federal investigations which have found Fortune 500 firms and thousands of large companies around the world have received federal small business contracts. Some of those firms are: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace (BAE), Northrop Grumman, General Electric, Booz Allen Hamilton, Thales Communications, General Dynamics, and Dell Computer. (https://www.asbl.com/documentlibrary.html#5-15)  

According to the US Census Bureau and the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, small businesses create over 90 percent of all net new jobs. (http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/rs359.pdf) When it comes to creating jobs, the focus must be on small business.

It is not surprising that the Obama Administration’s economic policies are not working. They are intended to create jobs, but are completely ignoring the small businesses that create all new jobs and employ over half of the private sector workforce, create over half of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP), are responsible for over 90 percent of the nation’s exports, and generate over 90 percent of new innovations.

Not only has the Obama Administration shortchanged small businesses with stimulus funds, but also information released by the Obama Administration clearly shows that every month President Obama has been in office, billions of dollars in small business contracts are being diverted to large businesses, Fortune 500 firms and multinational corporations.

An even bigger problem is that on Friday, the Obama Administration released its fiscal year (FY) 2009 small business contracting data and claimed to have awarded over $96 billion, or 21.8 percent, in federal contracts to small businesses. In reality, of the top 100 recipients of small business contracts, 60 were large businesses that received 65 percent of the total contract dollars. In addition to diverting billions of dollars in federal small business contracts to large businesses, the percentage of awards to small businesses was also dramatically inflated by using an acquisition budget that was less than half of what it actually is. (http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_program_office/govt_wide_2009.pdf)  

The actual federal acquisition budget for domestic, foreign, unclassified and classified contracting is well over $1 trillion a year. The Small Business Act currently states that small businesses are to receive not less than 23 percent of the total value of all prime contracts, which would be over $230 billion a year.

I am sure that 99.9 percent of all Americans would agree with me that the government should not be giving small business contracts to some of the biggest companies in the world. I think it is time for President Obama to honor his 2008 campaign promise, where he stated, “It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.” If you are sincerely interested in turning the economy around, just do what the law says, and simply give small businesses the portion of federal contracts that they already should be getting under the law. It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.

President Obama could achieve this by executive order, SBA policy, or by signing the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, H.R. 2568, into law.

-###-