Small-business contracting increases, but still short of goal

News

Small-business contracting increases, but still short of goal

By Sean Reilly
Federal Times
August 30, 2010

Small businesses won a record $96.8 billion in federal prime contracts in fiscal 2009, according to the Small Business Administration, but the total still falls short of the statutory 23 percent target.

Governmentwide, small businesses won 21.89 percent of contracts, an increase over the 21.5 percent reported for fiscal 2008, according to SBA's fourth annual procurement scorecard released Friday.

"This represents real progress, but not enough," SBA Administrator Karen Mills said in a news release. "We must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23 percent goal is met and exceeded."

The scorecard also shows that, as a group, federal agencies advanced slightly toward goals in subcategories such as contracts awarded to small businesses owned by women and service-disabled veterans.

Under a new grading system, SBA awarded the overall federal government a B. The rankings of 24 individual agencies varied widely.

For example, the Energy, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs department and SBA all received an "A." The General Services Administration's performance rated it only a "C," while the Office of Personnel Management, Agency for International Development and the National Science Foundation were marked "F."

In comments accompanying the scorecard, poorly ranked agencies offered various explanations. GSA officials noted that its goal was 35.7 percent, considerably higher than the benchmark for the entire federal government. Twenty-seven percent of GSA contracts went to small businesses. USAID acknowledged that only 8.7 percent of its contract dollars went to small businesses, but attributed the outcome mostly to drug purchases required under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

The SBA figures were also challenged by the American Small Business League, a California-based organization that has previously accused the government of misrepresentation. After sampling the top 100 recipients of federal small business contracts in fiscal 2009, the league concluded that some 65 percent of the money went to large companies that in some cases were members of the Fortune 500, according to an analysis released in June. Based on that sample, the proportion of contract dollars going to small business is closer to 5 percent, the league said in a Monday news release.

"It's time to stop the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations," spokesman Christopher Gunn said in a phone interview.

Source: http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20100830/ACQUISITION03/8300304/

Small Business chief sees small firms as vital to recovery

News

Small Business chief sees small firms as vital to recovery

By Laura Petrecca
USA Today
August 30, 2010

As head of the Small Business Administration, Karen Mills assists small businesses with counseling, financing and access to government contracts.

She also has to deal with uncertainty about how much the SBA will be able to help those companies. A small-business aid bill stalled this summer in the Senate, and a final vote won't come until Congress reconvenes in two weeks.

"We have many problems to solve," says Mills, 56.

Reporter Laura Petrecca spoke with Mills about small-business lending, her plans to reinvigorate the SBA and what it's like to be the daughter of the folks who control the Tootsie Roll candy-making empire. Following are excerpts, edited for clarity and length.

 

 

Q: Why is small-business expansion such a big deal?

A: Small businesses are really the

engine in the economy. (They produce about) 65% of net job growth. Half of the people who work in this country own or work for a small business. Right now, the government's role is to give them more support, more momentum, because government isn't going to create the jobs; small business is going to create the jobs.

Q: What are the most pressing issues facing small-business owners?

A: They worry about making sure that they are going to have a stable access to capital. They are saying, "I need capital to take that next order." They look at their business plans, and they want to make sure that they are prepared to move forward.

Q: What are the agency's top priorities?

A: We call it the three C's — capital is one of them. The second one is counseling. Small businesses, you can give them capital, but what they often need as much is mentoring, advice and help with their business plan. We actually have (about) 900 Small Business Development Centers around the country. They're getting the small-business owner to rethink their business plan to meet these economic times. They're getting them to a community bank and access to capital that might help them. The third C is contracting. At the SBA, we're responsible for making sure that 23% of all government contracts go to small business. Our job is to provide access and opportunity.

Q: After months of debate, Congress still hasn't voted on the latest small-business aid bill, which is designed to spur lending and reduce loan fees. How is this affecting small businesses?

A: We had a very, very successful Recovery Act loan program. We were able to step in and provide a lot of access to capital when credit markets froze in 2008. (But) we ran out of money, and the supplement to that program is in this small-business jobs package.

The Recovery Act provisions ran out (at the end of May). We were still offering our regular loan packages, but our (lending) volume dropped 60% in (June).

Q: The SBA has taken a lot of heat for giving big business too many of the contracts designated for smaller firms. Has that been a challenge for you?

A: We came in and really took that on as a key objective. We are not going to be the agency where large businesses can masquerade as a small business and get a contract. We are closing down on fraud, waste and abuse. We have a three-pronged effort. Upfront, we're making sure that those who are supposed to be certified in the program are small businesses — that they are who they are supposed to be. In the middle, we are checking on them. We do thousands of site visits and audits. The third thing is that we're going after the bad actors, and we're seeing results.

Q: In 2007,your agency was at the bottom in the list of 30 federal agencies reviewed in American University's Best Places to Work study, but moved up to 26 in 2009. What have you done to improve morale?

A: This is a big priority for us. We are investing in our people and our information technology. I travel all around the country, and every place I go, I go see our district offices and our people we have out there. We have a full team that is working on what we call becoming a high-performance agency, breaking down silos, having strong communications and training. We are looking at training people to help them grow and have the tools they need to do their job. We're a small agency with a big mission, and the mission is more and more important. We need to invest in our people.

Q: Your previous job was president of private-equity investor and adviser firm MMP Group. What are the main differences in working there and this government job?

A: Some of the things are the same and some of the things are different. What is the same is that most of my work life — at least the last 30 years — I've been involved in growing small businesses. I've owned and invested in small businesses (from companies that make plastic injection molding to wood flooring), so that's my base. What's different is instead of doing it one by one, we have the opportunity to help tens of thousands of small businesses. That is extraordinarily exciting and rewarding.

Q: As someone who invested in businesses, you had to evaluate a company's potential for success. What makes a business owner stand out?

A: With the successful ones, you can almost feel it when you're in a room with them. These are people who both have a vision and are thoughtful about their plan. They know where to reach out for help. They are visionary, inspired, passionate and pragmatic. The successful ones tend to build on their success. They'll get counseling help; they'll reach out for exporting help. They'll be looking ahead to the next piece of the process, but they'll have a plan. It's not enough to just have the vision. You have to have tools and the support.

Q: You come from a business-focused family. Your grandfather's candy shop evolved into confections giant Tootsie Roll, where your mother and father are still top executives. Did that have any influence on you?

A: My family was in two businesses — they were in the textile business, and they were in the candy business. The conversations around the dinner table were all about the factory floor and how many machines were running and what was happening in the business. I grew up very engaged in manufacturing and as part of a family business. That certainly is part of the passion that I have for (business). My grandfather came to this country and started that business, and he was very important in telling me how to build a business. As he said, "This is what our family does — we build businesses." It's very much part of my DNA.

Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/2010-08-30-smallbizqa30_ST_N.htm?POE=click-refer

Double Dip Recession Could be Prevented with Silver Bullet Bill

Press Release

Double Dip Recession Could be Prevented with Silver Bullet Bill

August 27, 2010

Today it was announced the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) numbers for last month were lower than originally estimated. Home sales and consumer confidence are down, and unemployment claims are up. Many of the world's top economists are now acknowledging that a double dip recession is a distinct possibility.

Despite President Obama's claims that the nation will avoid a double dip recession, it's hard to argue with the numbers, and they are not encouraging.

There is hope for the nation's economy in a little known bill titled the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, H.R. 2568. Georgia Congressman Hank Johnson (GA - D) introduced H.R. 2568. The bill currently has 26 co-sponsors, including Joint Economic Committee (JEC) Chair, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D - NY).

H.R. 2568 is just seven and a half pages long. The heart of the bill is one sentence that would put more money into the middle class economy than any bill or stimulus program discussed to date. H.R. 2568 simply states the federal government can no longer give federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms, and thousands of other large businesses in the United States and Europe.

Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? Wouldn't 99.9 percent of all Americans agree the government should not be giving federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms?
Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found many of the largest firms in the world have received U.S. government small business funds. ABC, CBS and CNN have covered the story. (ABC, https://www.asbl.com/abc_evening_news.wmv; CBS, https://www.asbl.com/cbs.wmv; CNN, https://www.asbl.com/showmedia.php?id=1170)

Some of the corporate giants in America that have received billions of dollars in federal small business contracts include Bechtel, Xerox, Dell Computer, John Deere, Boeing, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, SAIC, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, General Dynamics and Titan Industries. According to the most recent data released by the Obama Administration, the largest recipient of federal small business contracts in fiscal year (FY) 2008 was Textron. Textron is a Fortune 500 defense contractor with 43,000 employees and over $14 billion in annual sales. Textron received over $775 million in federal small business contracts in a single year.

The diversion of federal small business funds to corporate giants is not limited to those companies in the United States. Other firms that received federal small business contracts included Rolls-Royce, British Aerospace (BAE), French firm Thales Communications, Ssangyong Corporation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea and Finmeccanica SpA, which is located in Italy and has 73,000 employees.

H.R. 2568 is a free and easy way to create jobs with no new spending and no new taxes. The bill is deficit neutral and will solve a federal contracting scandal that has gone on for more than a decade. H.R. 2568 would even allow President Obama to keep a campaign promise he made when he released the statement, "It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants." (http://www.barackobama.com/2008/02/26/the_american_small_business_le.php)

H.R. 2568 could redirect over $100 billion a year in existing federal infrastructure spending into the hands of the nation's 27 million small businesses. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, small businesses create over 97 percent of all net new jobs in America. (http://www.inc.com/news/articles/200708/data.html) A report by the Kaufman Foundation found that firms that are less than five years old create nearly 100 percent of net new jobs.

I know President Obama has some of the nation's top economic advisers, but so far their ideas do not seem to be working. Let's see if we can't figure this out, and come up with some new ideas. 1. Small businesses create virtually all the net new jobs in America. 2. Over 12 federal investigations found the federal government is giving billions of dollars in federal small business contracts to many of the largest firms in the world. 3. The government needs to create jobs to stop the nation's economy from sliding over the edge into a double dip recession. Ohhh, I think I have a crazy idea that we haven't tried. Why don't we try not giving billions of dollars a week in federal small business contracts to some of the biggest companies in the world? I know it's a wild and wacky idea, but what have we got to lose.

Let's just say this, there is no downside to passing H.R. 2568. Compare H.R. 2568 to President Obama's $30 billion small business lending bill; what do you think will create more jobs? A one time shot of $30 billion in loans to small business, or over $100 billion a year in federal contracts every year, year-after-year.

Obama-Administration Fabricated Small-Business Contracting Data Coming Soon

Press Release

Obama-Administration Fabricated Small-Business Contracting Data Coming Soon

August 24, 2010

Any day now the Obama administration will release the latest federal data on the volume of government contracts that were awarded to small businesses. Federal law requires a minimum of 23 percent of all federal contracts to be awarded to small businesses. I'm betting the "Change We Can Believe In" Obama administration will completely falsify the actual percentage of government contracts that were awarded to legitimate small businesses.

Despite all his rhetoric and pandering to small businesses, the latest government small-business contracting data will prove President Obama is just another "business as usual" politician who is willing to say or do anything to get elected with no intention of honoring campaign promises. Everyone has an opinion when it comes to politics, but however you slice it, the Obama administration has failed to honor its promises to the small business community. In June, the American Small Business League (ASBL) released an analysis of the Obama administration's poor small business track record.

I am predicting that the actual volume of federal contracts the government will claim to have awarded to small businesses during fiscal year (FY) 2009 will be grossly misrepresented. The data will prove that President Obama's promise to end the diversion of billions of dollars a year in federal small-business contracts to corporate giants was empty. The Obama administration's neglect of this issue during its tenure has cheated the nation's 27 million small businesses out of billions of dollars in federal funds that by law should be allocated to small businesses. I predict the following regarding the release, and the immediate fallout after the release of the Obama administration's FY 2009 small-business contracting data:

1. To avoid scrutiny from the media, the data will be released late on a Friday in the next several weeks.
2. There will be no mainstream media coverage of the release of the data. The largest federal program to direct federal infrastructure spending to the private sector will go unreported. The intentional diversion of more than $100 billion in federal small business funds to large businesses around the world will go largely unreported by the mainstream media. You will not see this story on ABC, CBS or NBC. You won't see it in the Washington Post, the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.
3. The Obama administration will claim to have just missed its congressionally mandated 23-percent goal. Administration officials will claim to have awarded just over 22 percent of the government's purchases to small businesses. In reality, less than 5 percent of government contracts will have actually gone to legitimate small businesses.
4. The government's FY 2009 small-business contracting data will be falsified in several ways. First: Obama administration officials will claim the federal acquisition budget is less than half of what it actually is. The real federal acquisition budget for foreign, domestic, classified and unclassified acquisitions is nearly $1 trillion. Second: Thousands of large businesses, Fortune 500 firms and foreign-owned corporations will be included in the Obama administration's small business data. Billions of dollars in contracts awarded to U.S. based large businesses will be hidden under the categories "miscellaneous foreign contractors" and "classified domestic contractors."
5. If any attention is brought to fact that thousands of large businesses are included in the data, officials at the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) will claim it is the result of "miscoding," "computer glitches," and "simple human error."
6. No journalist will ask any Obama administration official why the alleged "random errors" always report awards to large businesses as small-business contracts and never the other way around. No journalist will ask why the one field that indicates if a firm is small or large has an error rate thousands of times higher than any other field in the database. No journalist will ask why there are so many errors in the data, even after the government spent nearly a year analyzing the data before its release.
7. No White House Correspondent will ever ask President Obama why his administration is diverting federal small-business contracts to large businesses, despite his campaign promise to, "end the diversion of federal small-business contracts to corporate giants."
8. No member of Congress will complain about the fact that the Obama administration is diverting federal small business funds to large businesses.
9. The release of the fabricated small business data will not prompt any member of Congress to call for the immediate passage of H.R. 2568, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act. The bill would halt the yearly diversion of over $100 billion in federal small-business contracts to large businesses, and redirect those funds to the private sector firms that create a majority of net new jobs in America.
10. No group claiming to represent the interests of American small businesses (other than the ASBL) will be critical of the Obama Administration for diverting small business funds to large businesses, and falsifying compliance with the government's 23 percent small-business contracting goal.

The ASBL projects that over the last decade this fraud and abuse has diverted more than a trillion dollars away from the middle class. Unless the mainstream media starts making this issue a priority, another trillion dollars in small-business contracts will flow into the hands of large businesses over the next decade.

Obama Refusing to Back Private Sector Jobs Bill

Press Release

Obama Refusing to Back Private Sector Jobs Bill

August 24, 2010

Petaluma, Calif. – President Barack Obama is refusing to back a bill that could create millions of jobs in the private sector. The bill, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, H.R.2568, was  introduced by Georgia Congressman Hank Johnson last May. The American Small Business League (ASBL) wrote the original draft of H.R. 2568. The bill is designed to stop the federal government from diverting over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms and many of the largest businesses in Europe.
 
Since 2003, a series of federal investigations have found billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts have been diverted to firms like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Bechtel, Dell Computer and Xerox. Corporate giants from around the world that have received U.S. government small business contracts include Rolls-Royce, British Aerospace (BAE), French giant Thales Communications, Ssangyong Corporation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea and Finmeccanica SpA, which is located in Italy and has 73,000 employees.  A recent investigation by Stars and Stripes Magazine found the federal government had awarded over $41.6 billion in small business contracts to “miscellaneous foreign contractors.” (http://www.stripes.com/blogs/ombudsman/ombudsman-1.8931/behind-the-media-contractors-veil-1.110840)  
 
H.R. 2568 would stop the federal government from reporting contract awards to publicly traded firms and foreign owned companies as small business awards. The bill is based on language in the Small Business Act, which states that a small business must be “independently owned” in order to receive federal small business contracts.
 
If President Obama were to sign H.R. 2568 into law, or pass by executive order, over $100 billion in existing federal infrastructure spending would be redirected to legitimate small businesses in the private sector. Since the bill requires no new spending or tax increases, it is deficit neutral. The Obama Administration had estimated that for every billion dollars in infrastructure spending, 40,000 new jobs would be created. Based on those projections, if H.R. 2568 were to become law, over four million new jobs could be created. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/us/politics/07radio.html?hp)  
 
The ASBL points to H.R. 2568 as being far superior to the Obama Administration’s $30 billion small business lending bill. As opposed to a one-time infusion of $30 billion in loans, H.R. 2568 would inject over $100 billion a year in federal contracts into the small business economy for decades to come.


-###-