Oklahoma Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Close Small Business Administration

News

Oklahoma Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Close Small Business Administration

By Garrett Powders
Oklahoma NewsOn6
December 23, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C -            

North Carolina Senator Richard Burr is planning to revive a bill almost identical to one proposed in the Reagan Administration that would close the Small Business Association.

Co-sponsored by Indiana Senator Daniel Coats and Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe, the bill would combine the SBA with the Department of Commerce and the Department of Labor.

Opponents of the bill believe the purpose is to obscure hundreds of billions in fraud that has been uncovered in small business contracting, especially at the Department of Defense.

Federal investigations have found billions in federal small business contracts have actually gone to many of the nation's largest defense contractors.

Recent data from the Federal Procurement Data System shows 235 Fortune 500 firms received federal small business contracts last year.

If the bill becomes law, the Department of Commerce, which represents the 235 Fortune 500 firms, would have complete control over all federal small business programs.

A survey conducted by the American Small Business League showed that only two Chambers of Commerce out of the 3000 polled would support the bill.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are 28 million small businesses in America which are responsible for 90% of net new jobs, 50% of the Gross Domestic Product, 50% of the Private sector work force and 90% of all U.S. exporters.

NEW BILL IN CONGRESS COULD CLOSE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Press Release

NEW BILL IN CONGRESS COULD CLOSE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

By Lloyd Chapman
December 19, 2013

North Carolina Senator Richard Burr is proposing to
resurrect a plan from the Reagan Administration to essentially close the Small
Business Administration by combining it with the Department of Commerce and the
Department of Labor.


Former President Ronald Reagan tried to permanently close
the Small Business Administration by combining it with the Department of
Commerce. Senator Burr’s bill is almost identical to the Reagan plan to close
the SBA. (news story)

Burr’s bill, S. 1836 is cosponsored by Indiana Senator
Daniel Coats and Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe.

 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 98% of all U.S. firms
have less than 100 employees. There are approximately 28 million small business
in America and those small businesses are responsible for over 90% of the net
new jobs , over 50% of the Gross Domestic Product, over 50% of the Private
sector work force and over 90% of all U.S. exporters.   

The SBA is the only agency in government to assist American
small businesses. The SBA’s current budget is approximately .001% of the
Pentagon’s budget.Opponents of S. 1836 believe the true purpose of the bill is
to close the SBA to obscure hundreds of billions in fraud that has been
uncovered in small business contracting programs primarily at the Defense
Department.

Over the last ten years a series of federal investigations and
investigative reports in the media have found billions in federal small
business contracts have actually gone to some of the nation’s largest defense contractors.

According to the most recent data from the Federal Procurement Data System,
last year 235 Fortune 500 firms received federal small business contracts.

Every year for the last nine years the SBA Office of
inspector General has named the diversion of federal small business contracts
to corporate giants as the number one problem at the SBA. (report 5-15)

If S. 1836 were to be signed into law, the Department of Commerce, which represents the nation’s largest firms, including the 235 Fortune 500 firms that are currently receiving federal small business
contracts, would have complete control over all federal small business
programs.

The American Small Business League (ASBL) was anticipating
the introduction of a bill to close the SBA.

The ASBL recently completed a survey of 3000 Chambers of Commerce across the
country about a bill to close the SBA or combine it with the Department of
Commerce. Only two Chambers of Commerce said they would support such
legislation

.Video

Why the Long Wait for a New SBA Chief?

News

Why the Long Wait for a New SBA Chief?

By Patrick Clark
Bloomberg Businessweek
December 2, 2013

Karen Mills announced her resignation as administrator of the Small Business Administration in February, but didn’t leave the agency until August, when she decamped for a job at Harvard University. That same month, Mills’s deputy Jeanne Hulit was named acting administrator. President Obama has nominated more than 270 people to public office in the 10 months since Mills announced plans to leave the agency, the Washington Post pointed out last week. A permanent replacement for Mills wasn’t one of them.

What should small business owners and lenders who rely on the agency make of the delay?

There’s no clear reason why the lack of a permanent administrator would prevent the SBA from fulfilling its primary function of guaranteeing loans to small businesses. (To cite one example, the agency appeared to do a fine job managing the difficulties posed to its loan approval process by the recent partial shutdown of the federal government.)

That hasn’t kept Obama critics from blasting the president for the prolonged vacancy. Sam Graves, the Republican chairman of the House Small Business Committee, told the Post that the delay is “confirmation of how the president feels about small business.” American Small Business League founder Lloyd Chapman has argued that the absence of a nominee to replace Mills is evidence that the White House plans to disband the agency.

The White House didn’t respond to an e-mail seeking comment. It also hasn’t commented on past inquiries regarding the future leadership of the agency. In August, rumors circulated that one potential nominee had been disqualified by a background check. Conventional wisdom has also held that the White House would likely opt for a female, black, or Hispanic nominee, to emphasize the agency’s efforts to support woman- and minority-owned businesses.

Regardless of the reason for the delay, it’s unusual for the agency to go very long without a permanent administrator.

Since the SBA was formed in 1953, the agency has had 32 chiefs (PDF), including seven acting administrators. Of the temporary heads, Charles Heatherly had the longest tenure, taking over for James Sanders in April 1986 before passing the torch to former Senator James Abdnor in March 1987.

Heatherly may have held the acting title for so long because he helmed the agency at a time when then-President Reagan was trying to disband the SBA. On his first day in office, Heatherly fired six of the agency’s 10 regional directors because they disagreed with his plan to phase out the agency, the New York Times reported at the time. (Closing the SBA was a hard sell with members of Congress, who, then as now, like to tout their small business bona fides.)

There have been two other times when the agency lacked a permanent head for comparable periods, according to the SBA’s list. Sandy Baruah was acting administrator from July 2008 to January 2009, when Obama took office. That month, Baruah was replaced by Darryl Hairston, another acting administrator who led the agency until Mills was confirmed in April.

There was also an eight-month gap between SBA heads Eugene Foley, who left the agency in September 1965, and Bernard Boutin, who took over in May 1966. The historical record is light on details explaining the lag in replacing Foley, who is credited with piloting the agency’s Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) program (PDF), as well as a program to support lending to black business owners.

Quantifying the president’s delay in naming a new administrator depends on how you do the math. It’s been almost 10 months since Mills announced she was leaving. On the other hand, it’s only been three months since Mills left and Hulit took over as acting administrator.