Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Gets the (Small) Business

News

Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Gets the (Small) Business

By Neil Gordon
Project on Government Oversight Blog (POGO)
September 25, 2013

The American Small Business League (ASBL) has long fought to stop the flow of federal small business contracts to large companies that exceed the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) size standards. This week, the ASBL reported that 235 companies in the Fortune 500 received hundreds of millions of dollars in small business contracts in fiscal years 2012 and 2013.

Many of the Fortune 500 companies identified by the ASBL are also top federal contractors. Lockheed Martin, number 59 in the Fortune 500 and the federal government’s largest vendor, received more than $110 million in small business contracts in FYs 2012 and 2013. General Dynamics, number 98 in the Fortune ranking and the fourth largest federal contractor, received more than $215 million in small business contracts.

These findings follow the ASBL’s latest annual review of federal procurement data, which found that 71 of the top 100 small business contractors in FY 2012 were large companies. These companies, many in the Fortune 500, received a total of $9.5 billion in small business awards that year.

The federal government has a statutory goal of awarding 23 percent of all federal contract dollars to small businesses. According to the latest Small Business Goaling Report, the government came close in FY 2012 with 22.2 percent. However, as the ASBL has documented, agencies are counting dollars awarded to large companies toward their small business contracting goals.

How do large companies end up winning small business contracts? A 2011 report by the SBA Inspector General cited contractor size falsification or miscalculation as a factor, but placed most of the blame on the government for not adequately training contracting personnel. Lack of training also leads to agencies inflating their annual small business contracting numbers.

The ASBL has its own explanation for the problems in the small business contracting program. In a press statement issued Tuesday, the ASBL decries “rampant fraud at the SBA,” claiming the SBA “intentionally falsified the volume and percentage of federal contracts awarded to small businesses.”

At a time when small businesses, the purported “backbone” of the economy, are feeling the pain of sequestration, it is inexcusable that billions of dollars in federal contracts end up in the hands of the biggest of the big corporations. Whether this happens by outright fraud, innocent error, or a contracting workforce in need of a refresher course, the problems plaguing small business contracting demand immediate attention.

Obama's Justification for Closing the Small Business Administration Doesn't Add Up

 

Press Release

 

Obama's Justification for Closing the Small Business Administration Doesn't Add Up


September 25, 2013

ASBL President Lloyd Chapman issued the following:

Ronald Reagan tried to permanently close the Small Business Administration (SBA) during his administration. His plan to permanently close the SBA was to combine it with the Department of Commerce.

In November of 2008, I predicted President Obama would try and close the SBA by combining it with the Department of Commerce.

President Obama proved me right in January of 2012 when he announced his plan to close the SBA as Reagan tried, by combining it with the Department of Commerce. President Obama's sole excuse for essentially closing the SBA is to save a paltry, minuscule $300 million a year.

Lets put that into perspective. The current SBA budget is .001 percent of the Pentagon budget. The SBA's annual budget is approximately $700 million while the Pentagon budget is $700 billion.

The Pentagon's own auditors found 25 percent of the Pentagon's expenditures could not be accounted for.

That means, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., the Pentagon loses $87 million an hour. The Pentagon loses more money every day, before lunch than President Obama claims will be saved by essentially closing the SBA by combining it with the Department of Commerce.

That means the Pentagon loses enough money every day to run the SBA for a full year.

President Obama's claim that $300 million a year can be saved by closing the SBA is ludicrous and absurd, so what's the real reason?

Every year of the Obama Administration, the SBA Inspector General, Peg Gustafson, who was appointed by President Obama, has named the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants as the number one problem at the SBA.

Information from the SBA indicates that last year, 235 Fortune 500 firms received federal small business contracts. A series of federal investigations and investigative reports have all found rampant fraud at the SBA and every year billions of dollars in federal small business contracts have been diverted to Fortune 500 firms.

The Government Accountability Office investigated a SBA managed program and released Report 10-108. It stated, "By failing to hold firms accountable, the SBA and contracting agencies have sent a message to the contracting community that there is no punishment or consequences for committing fraud."

I don't think President Obama wants to close the SBA to save a minuscule, infinitesimal $300 million a year. I think he wants to close the SBA to obscure the rampant fraud and abuse that has been uncovered at the SBA during Karen Mills' tenure as administrator.

It certainly doesn't make sense to close the SBA to save $300 million a year when the Pentagon loses more than that every day before lunch, now does it?

For the latest video from the ASBL, click here.

Small Business Administration Forced to Release Fraudulent Contracting Data

Press Release

Small Business Administration Forced to Release Fraudulent Contracting Data

September 24, 2013

The Small Business Administration (SBA) has been forced to release more evidence of rampant fraud at the SBA under the leadership of Karen Mills. The information shows that between 2012 and 2013, small business contracts had been diverted to 235 Fortune 500 firms.

On July 2, the SBA claimed the federal government had awarded $89.9 billion or 22.25 percent of all federal contracting dollars to legitimate small businesses in fiscal year 2012. Federal law mandates a minimum of 23 percent of all contracts go to American small businesses.

The American Small Business League (ASBL) requested the names of all the firms the SBA had included in the $89.9 billion figure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The SBA denied the request.

The SBA finally released the names of the firms after the ASBL filed an appeal and threatened further legal action if the SBA refused to comply with the FOIA request.

The information the SBA was forced to release last week proved that under the leadership of Mills, the SBA intentionally falsified the volume and percentage of federal contracts awarded to small businesses by including billions of dollars in contracts to over 230 Fortune 500 firms. No federal law allows the inclusion of Fortune 500 firms to be in any definition of a small business.

In 2012, General Dynamics, with 81,000 employees and more than $21 billion in annual revenue, received at least $215 million in small business contracts. In the same time period, Italian conglomerate Finmeccanica received $5,111,337 in U.S. small business contracts. And number 16 on the 2012 Fortune 500 list, Verizon received $38,540,761 in small business contracts in fiscal year 2012 alone.

Some of the firms the SBA included in their small business contracting statistics under the leadership of Mills were Chevron, Berkshire Hathaway, Apple, GE, AT&T, CVS, McKesson, HP, Verizon, United Health Group, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Costco, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Prudential Financial, Home Depot, Microsoft, Walgreens, Johnson & Johnson, Caterpillar, PepsiCo, Comcast, WellPoint, Amazon, Dell, Intel, Coca-Cola, CBS, Best Buy, FedEx, Sysco, Walt Disney, DuPont, Humana, Hess, Honeywell, Oracle, Delta Airlines, John Deere, Sprint, General Dynamics, DirecTV, Northrop Grumman, American Airlines, Staples, Raytheon, Nike, Xerox, Global Partners and thousands more.

The SBA inspector general has named the diversion of federal small business contracts as the number one challenge at the SBA for the last nine consecutive years.

The ASBL predicts President Obama will attempt to close the SBA under the guise of combining it with the Department of Commerce to cover up the rampant fraud at the agency. The Department of Commerce represents the interests of the very Fortune 500 firms that have been allowed to hijack federal small business contracts for over a decade.

During his presidency, Ronald Reagan tried to permanently close the SBA by combining it with the Department of Commerce.

For the latest video from the ASBL, click here.

###

What's Up with the Small Business Administration (SBA)?

News

What's Up with the Small Business Administration (SBA)?

VetLikeMe
September 12, 2013

This is the main question within the veteran-owned smallbusiness community in light of recent events. Businesses with fewer than 500employees account for:

·        99% of all employer firms,

·        jobs for over half of the nation's private workforce,

·        nearly two-thirds of all new jobs, and

·        44% of total U.S. private payroll.

 

This is a huge part of the American economy, giving theAdministrator of the SBA the potential to have major influence on Americancommerce. Surprisingly, the top SBA position has been vacant for some time now,leading me to believe that the Executive Branch does not view small businessprogress as a priority. Surely there are plenty of people with the talent anddesire to have a key position like this to serve their country and thousands ofsmall businesses across the country.

After appointing Karen Mills as the new SBA Administrator in2009, President Obama elevated SBA to Cabinet-level status in January 2012.Small businesses across the country hailed this political advancement of smallbusiness a major victory.
Under Mills tenure, the SBA backed more than $106 billion in loans to smallcompanies. This included record years of more than $30 billion worth of loanguarantees in both 2011 and 2012. Mills led a charge to make it easier forsmall businesses to apply for various government-backed loans and automatedmuch of the application process.

Her tenure was also marred by allegations of widespread fraudand abuse of SBA programs, according to FOX Business News.

During Mills' term at the SBA, the minimum 23 percent of federalcontracts that should go to small business by law was never met. Federalcontracting goals for woman-owned firms, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned smallbusinesses, minority-owned and HUBZone small businesses were rarely – if ever —met.

Though one cannot say if the lack of meeting these smallbusiness 'goals' precipitated this change of course and Administrative action,rumor has it that SBA might be shifted to the Department of Commerce. Noverifiable source has been identified to sustain this rumor.

At that time, the Pentagon was the driving force behind twofailed campaigns to move SBS to Commerce.

However, interesting developments within SBA may give someindication of what may be in store for the Small Business Administration.

Lloyd Chapman writes in the Huffington Post:

"Senior Pentagon officials and some of the biggest names in thedefense and aerospace industry have been lobbying for more than thirty years toclose the SBA in order to cover up decades of rampant fraud in federal smallbusiness contracting programs by the DoD and its prime contractors. The excusesfrom the government that every year, for over a decade, small businesscontracts wind up in the hands of some of the nation's largest defensecontractors as a result of "miscoding, computer glitches, anomalies and simplehuman error" are starting to wear thin and are no longer believable orsustainable.

"ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN have all covered the story of thediversion of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal small businesscontracts to major Pentagon prime contractors." Full article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lloyd-chapman/pentagon-pr-heavyweight-t_b_3825196.html

Majormedia sources contend, however, that a senior Pentagon PR official, RetiredCommander Terrance Sutherland, has taken over the SBA press office. Sutherlandhas tamped down some of the biggest flare-ups ever in DoD. What's odd aboutthis? DoD has never met of the minimum contract expenditures awarded to smallbusiness. The most recent years of the SBA 'Scorecard' indicates that DoDranked among the worst government agencies to contract with small business. Andthe "Scorecard" is just another toothless, bureaucratic measurement that shouldbe very easy to meet.

Some small business representatives, including many forservice-disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB) and veteran owned smallbusiness (VOSB) regard Sutherland's reassignment as a ruse to appease the smallbusiness community. His reassignment could accomplish several things:

·        Prop-up DoD's flailing 'Scorecard' numbers to small business;

·        Redirect giant contracts that account for the massive cases ofDoD contract fraud to small business;

·        Prepare the Commerce Department for incoming SBA functions;

·        Aid in dismantling the SBA;

·        De-rail HR 2882, a bill introduced last month by Mike Coffman(R-CO), to transfer SDVOSB/VOSB from VA to SBA;

·        Increase employment opportunities in both agencies for the hugeinflux of veterans returning from the Middle East. This accomplishment is theonly positive economic result, but very unlikely. DoD and VA public relationsoffices (AND Sutherland) would have publicized the heck out of this weeks ago.

Sutherland, a retired Commander in the US Navy, was a careerpublic relations professional handling controversial DoD situations such ascases of "rape, murder, downed spy planes, terrorist attacks, shootings by militarypersonnel, Saddam Hussein and advanced weapons systems.

Sutherland has been on the front lines many times with greatsuccesses for DoD.

On another front, the Government Accountability Office's (GAO)recently released Report 10-108, which indicated: "By failing to hold firmsaccountable, the SBA and contracting agencies have sent a message to thecontracting community that there is no punishment or consequences forcommitting fraud." GAO also found that up to 25 percent of Pentagonexpenditures cannot be accounted for.

Now THAT'S a major flare-up, but can Sutherland address this? Ihope so, but what then with SBA? Does it lose its status as a Cabinet-levelagency? Will it become a pawn in the Commerce Department? Just another wing inan invisible government building? If this turns out to be the case, smallbusiness will rank extremely low in the American economic landscape.


What's Up with the Small Business Administration (SBA)?



News


What's Up with the Small Business Administration (SBA)?


VetLikeMe




September 12, 2013

















This is the main question within the veteran-owned small

business community
in light of recent events. Businesses with fewer than 500

employees account for:


·        

99% of all employer firms,


·        

jobs for over half of the nation's private workforce,


·        

nearly two-thirds of all new jobs, and


·        

44% of total U.S. private payroll.


 


This is a huge part of the American economy, giving the

Administrator of the SBA the potential to have major influence on American

commerce. Surprisingly, the top SBA position has been vacant for some time now,

leading me to believe that the Executive Branch does not view small business

progress as a priority. Surely there are plenty of people with the talent and

desire to have a key position like this to serve their country and thousands of

small businesses across the country.


After appointing Karen Mills as the new SBA Administrator in

2009, President Obama elevated SBA to Cabinet-level status in January 2012.

Small businesses across the country hailed this political advancement of small

business a major victory.


Under Mills tenure, the SBA backed more than $106 billion in loans to small

companies. This included record years of more than $30 billion worth of loan

guarantees in both 2011 and 2012. Mills led a charge to make it easier for

small businesses to apply for various government-backed loans and automated

much of the application process.


Her tenure was also marred by allegations of widespread fraud

and abuse of SBA programs, according to FOX Business News.


During Mills' term at the SBA, the minimum 23 percent of federal

contracts that should go to small business by law was never met. Federal

contracting goals for woman-owned firms, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned small

businesses, minority-owned and HUBZone small businesses were rarely – if ever —

met.


Though one cannot say if the lack of meeting these small

business 'goals' precipitated this change of course and Administrative action,

rumor has it that SBA might be shifted to the Department of Commerce. No

verifiable source has been identified to sustain this rumor.


At that time, the Pentagon was the driving force behind two

failed campaigns to move SBS to Commerce.


However, interesting developments within SBA may give some

indication of what may be in store for the Small Business Administration.


Lloyd Chapman writes in the Huffington Post:


"Senior Pentagon officials and some of the biggest names in the

defense and aerospace industry have been lobbying for more than thirty years to

close the SBA in order to cover up decades of rampant fraud in federal small

business contracting programs by the DoD and its prime contractors. The excuses

from the government that every year, for over a decade, small business

contracts wind up in the hands of some of the nation's largest defense

contractors as a result of "miscoding, computer glitches, anomalies and simple

human error" are starting to wear thin and are no longer believable or

sustainable.


"ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN have all covered the story of the

diversion of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal small business

contracts to major Pentagon prime contractors." Full article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lloyd-chapman/pentagon-pr-heavyweight-t_b_3825196.html


Major

media sources contend, however, that a senior Pentagon PR official, Retired

Commander Terrance Sutherland, has taken over the SBA press office. Sutherland

has tamped down some of the biggest flare-ups ever in DoD. What's odd about

this? DoD has never met of the minimum contract expenditures awarded to small

business. The most recent years of the SBA 'Scorecard' indicates that DoD

ranked among the worst government agencies to contract with small business. And

the "Scorecard" is just another toothless, bureaucratic measurement that should

be very easy to meet.


Some small business representatives, including many for

service-disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB) and veteran owned small

business (VOSB) regard Sutherland's reassignment as a ruse to appease the small

business community. His reassignment could accomplish several things:


·        

Prop-up DoD's flailing 'Scorecard' numbers to small business;


·        

Redirect giant contracts that account for the massive cases of

DoD contract fraud to small business;


·        

Prepare the Commerce Department for incoming SBA functions;


·        

Aid in dismantling the SBA;


·        

De-rail HR 2882, a bill introduced last month by Mike Coffman

(R-CO), to transfer SDVOSB/VOSB from VA to SBA;


·        

Increase employment opportunities in both agencies for the huge

influx of veterans returning from the Middle East. This accomplishment is the

only positive economic result, but very unlikely. DoD and VA public relations

offices (AND Sutherland) would have publicized the heck out of this weeks ago.


Sutherland, a retired Commander in the US Navy, was a career

public relations professional handling controversial DoD situations such as

cases of "rape, murder, downed spy planes, terrorist attacks, shootings by military

personnel, Saddam Hussein and advanced weapons systems.


Sutherland has been on the front lines many times with great

successes for DoD.


On another front, the Government Accountability Office's (GAO)

recently released Report 10-108, which indicated: "By failing to hold firms

accountable, the SBA and contracting agencies have sent a message to the

contracting community that there is no punishment or consequences for

committing fraud." GAO also found that up to 25 percent of Pentagon

expenditures cannot be accounted for.


Now THAT'S a major flare-up, but can Sutherland address this? I

hope so, but what then with SBA? Does it lose its status as a Cabinet-level

agency? Will it become a pawn in the Commerce Department? Just another wing in

an invisible government building? If this turns out to be the case, small

business will rank extremely low in the American economic landscape.