Griffith: Bill needs more work

News

Griffith: Bill needs more work

By Trevor Stokes
Times Daily
September 30, 2009

MUSCLE SHOALS - U.S. Rep. Parker Griffith said this week that legislation meant to guarantee federal contracts to small businesses and scathed by an industry group will require modifications before moving forward.

Griffith, a member of the House Committee on Small Business, introduced the Small Business Fair Competition Act (H.R. 3558) on Sept. 14, the fifth bill sponsored by the junior congressman. Federal law mandates that 23 percent of all federal contracts each fiscal year be awarded to small businesses.

Griffith meant his bill to give a framework as to which companies would be eligible to compete for governmental contracts worth billions of federal dollars.

The American Small Business League, a group of 100,000 dues-paying small business owners, however, has rolled out a campaign against the legislation. They say it gives a loophole for large corporations to use small subsidiaries to scoop up the lucrative contracts.

"We recognize that the bill needs to be modified and have said to our critic, 'I think your point is well made,' " Griffith said.

"It seems that the individual that is attacking the bill may not be interested in improving the situation, he may just be interested in some notoriety," Griffith said.

The league had a different take.

"It is simply not believable that Congressman Griffith accidentally wrote a bill that is going to allow the subsidiaries of some of his largest campaign contributors like Boeing (and) Northrop Grumman to get small business contracts. It is absurd," American Small Business League President Lloyd Chapman wrote in an e-mail response Tuesday.

"He tries to tell people that I'm seeking notoriety. If anyone is disingenuous, it's Congressman Griffith, because his staff told us a week ago that they were dropping their support for the bill."

Small businesses are defined by the Small Business Administration in a 44-page table that Griffith said hasn't been re-evaluated in 20 years.

For example, a peanut farmer who earns more than $750,000 is considered a large business; a cotton gin that has less than $7 million in sales is a small business, according to the guide.

Griffith's 283-word legislation would give large corporations a loop-hole that would allow them to compete with small businesses, critics say.

"There are difficulties in the bill I have introduced that will have to be modified so that it doesn't have any unintended consequences," Griffith said. "We want to avoid our larger businesses setting up smaller companies to compete against our small companies."

Griffith has said that other business groups were consulted and supported the legislation, but Chapman countered, "We are routinely the only critic of this type of legislation because every other "small business group" in America is funded by Fortune 500 corporations. I take personal offense to Congressman Griffith's notion that I do all this for notoriety. I intend to double my efforts to bring attention to the negative consequence the bill carries.

"15 federal investigations, 10 years, and more than 500 stories on the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations - and now Congressman Griffith has introduced legislation that will make the problem worse."

When asked how the bill would be modified, Griffith responded, "There is a way to modify that bill so that if Boeing or Northrup Grumman has any ownership in any of the small businesses that are applying, they would be disallowed."

Boeing and Northrop Grumman are not only major industries in north Alabama, but contributors to Griffith's war chest. Northrop Grumman, Griffith's top campaign contributor, donated $11,000 and Boeing, ranked eighth, donated $9,500 to Griffith's campaign, according to opensecrets.org, a political monitoring site.

Another criticism of the bill was that companies may be small at the initial time the contract is awarded, but 20 years later, may still be awarded the contract as a small company even though they have outgrown the definition.

A competing bill, The Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act (H.R. 2568), was introduced in May by U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., with 14 co-sponsors. The bill would ban publicly-traded corporations or businesses with more than 50 percent non-U.S. citizen ownership from being defined as a small business.

On Monday, during a stop in the Shoals, Griffith said, "I'm completely unfamiliar with it, but we can become familiar with it."

Trevor Stokes can be reached at 740-5728 or trevor.stokes@TimesDaily.com.

Source:  http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20090930/ARTICLES/909305008/1011/NEWS?Title=Griffith-Bill-needs-more-work

US Senate 'snubs' small firms over contract reform

News

US Senate 'snubs' small firms over contract reform

By Staff
Procurement Leaders
September 28, 2009

The US Senate has been accused of "snubbing" small businesses in forthcoming talks to reform Federal contracting practices. The allegation was made yesterday by the American Small Business League (ASBL), which claims that small businesses are not being fairly represented on the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

Referring to a scheduled roundtable discussion regarding contracting reform for small businesses, ASBL noted that it had not been invited to testify: "The American Small Business League (ASBL) is raising concerns regarding the lack of small business voices that will be present at the committee-run roundtable event."

"We don't expect to be invited to these types of meetings because the Senate Committee on Small Business has no interest in contracting reform," ASBL president Lloyd Chapman said.

"Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found that billions of dollars in contracts earmarked for small businesses have been diverted to Fortune 500 firms. This issue has been featured on every major television network and in every major newspaper in the country, yet the committee has failed to lift a finger to stop it for seven years. 2009 represents the tenth anniversary of the diversion of federal small business contracts to large corporations."

ASBL claims that Information in the Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation (FPDS - NG) indicates that the Obama Administration included billions of dollars in contracts awarded to Fortune 500 firms and even some of the largest corporations in the world towards its fiscal year (FY) 2008 small business goals.

The pressure group alleges that firms such as: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Dell Computers, British Aerospace (BAE), Rolls-Royce, French giant Thales, Ssangyong Corporation headquartered in South Korea and the Italian Finmeccanica SpA, received billions of dollars in federal small business contracts during FY 2008.





Source:  http://www.procurementleaders.com/news/latestnews/247-us-senate-snubs-small-firms/

Alabama Congressman Parker Griffith Wants Big Businesses to Get Federal Small Business Funds

Press Release

Alabama Congressman Parker Griffith Wants Big Businesses to Get Federal Small Business Funds

September 24, 2009

Petaluma, Calif. - Huntsville Alabama Congressman Parker Griffith (D - AL5) has introduced a new bill in the House of Representatives that will allow divisions of Fortune 500 firms and thousands of other large businesses to receive billions of dollars in federal contracts earmarked for small businesses.
 
Several Fortune 500 firms in Congressman Griffith's district such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman and British Aerospace (BAE) are currently receiving millions of dollars in federal small business contracts through loopholes in federal contracting law.
 
If H.R. 3558 becomes law, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, BAE and their subsidiaries could continue to receive federal small business contracts indefinitely. Boeing and Northrop Grumman are amongst Congressman Griffith's largest campaign contributors. (http://tiny.cc/JWuUg)  
 
Currently, there are 5,126 small businesses registered to do business with the federal government in the State of Alabama, according to the Central Contractor Registration database. If H.R. 3558 is passed and signed into law, more than 99 percent of the small businesses in Alabama would be put at a significant competitive disadvantage.
 
In 2005, the Small Business Administration Office of Inspector General (SBA IG) referred to the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants as, "One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire Federal government today." (https://www.asbl.com/documents/05-15.pdf)  


Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found that Fortune 500 firms in the United States and some of the largest firms in Korea, Italy, Holland, France and England have received billions of dollars in federal small business contracts.
 
Another bill that has been introduced in the House of Representatives, "the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act of 2009," or H.R. 2568, is designed to close all of the loopholes, and halt the flow of federal small business contracts to large businesses.
 
H.R. 2568 was introduced by Congressman Hank Johnson (D - GA) and has 15 co-sponsors. Congressman Johnson's bill is backed by small business groups and chambers of commerce across the country.
 
Research by the American Small Business League (ASBL) estimates that legitimate small businesses are losing over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts through various loopholes in federal contracting law and policy.
 
ASBL estimates that if H.R. 2568 becomes law, over $100 billion a year in federal small business contracts will be redirected to middle class firms nationwide. If Congressman Griffith's bill, H.R. 3558, becomes law billions of dollars in federal small business contracts will continue to be diverted to corporate giants.

-###-

Please click here to watch a short clip about the ASBL's concerns regarding H.R. 3558: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbGwwEaEGSM

House bill could help some small businesses, hurt others

News

House bill could help some small businesses, hurt others

By PAULINE CROSS
123Print.com
September 18, 2009

Representative Parker Griffith of Alabama's fifth Congressional district this week proposed a bill that would change the way the government contracts with small businesses.

The Small Business Fair Competition Act, if made law, would allow small businesses that are no longer small because of government contracts to continue being considered small businesses when it is time to re-bid the contract.

Griffith and his supporters say that the bill will make it easier for small businesses to retain government contracts that could help keep them afloat in tough economic times. They say that the current structure under which the government deals with small businesses is outdated and anti-competitive, and that the law is overdue for a change.

Critics say that the bill would, in actuality, create a huge loophole through which incumbent contractors grown large and successful on government funds would gain an unfair stranglehold on their contracts. American Small Business League president Lloyd Chapman told Alabama's Times Daily that "[the bill] is one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of a member of Congress selling legislation to the highest bidder."

The bill will be considered by both the House Small Business and Government Reform and Oversight committees.





Source:  http://www.123print.com/News/House-bill-could-help-some-small-businesses-hurt-others-646

Bill would let firms that outgrow their size status retain set-aside contracts

News

Bill would let firms that outgrow their size status retain set-aside contracts

By Elizabeth Newell
Government Executive
September 18, 2009

Legislation introduced this week to allow incumbent contractors to recompete for small business set-asides even if they no longer qualify as small is causing a stir in the contracting community.

The Small Business Fair Competition Act (H.R. 3558) introduced by Rep. Parker Griffith, D-Ala., would let companies that have outgrown the Small Business Administration's size and economic thresholds for certification compete with small firms to keep their current contract as long as they can show they were small at the time of the initial award. The companies also must prove to the government that they would slip back under SBA's thresholds if they lost the work.

"If passed, this bill will put an end to an outdated regulation on small business that punishes our entrepreneurs for their own success," Griffith said in a statement. "This regulation puts a ceiling on motivation to grow small business, effectively putting a cap on how far our local economies can develop. That is the exact opposite of the American dream. This is a pro-small business bill that supports and promotes our men and women who build success stories from the ground up."

But small business advocates don't see it that way. Lloyd Chapman, president of the American Small Business League, called the bill "a colossal, anti-small business loophole to divert federal small business funds to some of [Griffith's] largest campaign contributors." Chapman said it's not credible to expect a politician whose top contributors include major Defense contractors such as Northrop Grumman Corp. and Boeing Co. to write legislation supporting small businesses.

"This is one of the most egregious examples I have ever seen of a member of Congress selling legislation to the highest bidder," Chapman said.

Griffith spokesman Sean Magers said the congressman's office became aware of the American Small Business League's concerns only after they were released to the press. Magers said Griffith is in the process of contacting the group and "he looks forward to working with them to address each and every concern they have with the bill."

Chapman's concern, however, was echoed by Kenneth Weckstein, a partner in Brown Rudnick's government contracts and litigation group. "When I see legislation like this, I think there's some company behind it that may have asked to promote it," Weckstein said.

Small business set-asides are designed to help small firms become successful so they can compete against large companies, he noted.

"I sort of understand the intent and there are small businesses that once they lose their big contract they may have trouble surviving or go back to the way they were before," he said. "But they're not taking advantage of what they're learning and gaining from that set-aside."

According to Weckstein, the legislation also has the potential to create an almost permanent monopoly on a contract.

The legislation is awaiting consideration from the House Small Business Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Source:  http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0909/091809e1.htm