Government Loophole Will Slow Economic Recovery for Middle Class America

Press Release

Government Loophole Will Slow Economic Recovery for Middle Class America

August 26, 2009

Petaluma, Calif. - A loophole created by the federal government is having a significant negative impact on the economic recovery of middle class America. The latest U.S. Census Bureau data shows that 98 percent of all U.S. firms have less than 100 employees. These firms employ over 50.2 percent of the private sector work force, create over 97 percent of all net new jobs and generate over 50 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Federal law stipulates that 23 percent of the total value of all federal contracts awarded each year shall go to small businesses.

With the annual federal acquisition budget hovering around $700 billion, the nation's 27 million small businesses should be able to count on approximately $161 billion a year in federal contracts being channeled into the middle class economy. 

Unfortunately, the federal government has created colossal loopholes that have diverted the vast majority of federal small business contracts away from middle class America and into the hands of many of the largest firms in the world.

The federal government adopted a policy, which allowed large businesses to acquire a small business and retain that firm's small business status for 20 years. A reporter from CBS forced this out of an SBA official in a 2004 interview. In July of 2007, the Small Business Administration (SBA) implemented a rule change requiring 5-year recertification of small business status.  This rule change "grandfathered" large businesses currently receiving federal small business contracts into the government's contracting data.  As a result, the overwhelming majority of federal contracts intended for American small businesses will be diverted to Fortune 500 firms and thousands of large businesses around the world until the year 2012.

Last week, the Obama Administration released the latest data on federal contracts awarded to small businesses. The top recipient of federal small business contracts was Textron. Textron is a Fortune 500 firm with 43,000 employees and over $14 billion in annual sales. Their AAI division received $775,773,505 in small business contracts during fiscal year (FY) 2008. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/20090821Top100SBContracting%20Numbers2008.pdf)  

Other firms receiving federal small business contracts included, British Aerospace (BAE), Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, GTSI, L-3 Communications, Northrop Grumman, Booz Allen Hamilton, General Dynamics, 3M Company, Hewlett-Packard, AT&T, Dell Computer, Staples, Office Depot, Xerox, General Electric, Rolls-Royce and French firm Thales Communications. Finmeccanica SpA in Italy with more than 73,000 employees received $273,872,995 in small business contracts; Ssangyong Corporation in Seoul, South Korea received $254,149,950 in federal small business contracts. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/20090825TopSmallBusinessContractors2008.pdf)  

The American Small Business League (ASBL) estimates that over $100 billion a year in federal contracts that by law should go to middle class firms are diverted to worldwide corporate giants. (www.asbl.com)

-###-

Please click here to watch our response to the Obama Administration's small business contracting statistics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV0jeTrYPsM

 

 

Whom Does the N.F.I.B. Represent (Besides Its Members)?

News

Whom Does the N.F.I.B. Represent (Besides Its Members)?

By Robb Mandelbaum
The New York Times
August 26, 2009

A few weeks back, You’re The Boss readers rose up in mild insurrection against The Agenda. The occasion was a look at the Small Business Majority, a liberal organization trying to influence the health care debate. Readers thought The Agenda was unfair. “Subject the other business organizations to the same analysis and you would find AT LEAST as much ideology and partisan bias as the author has found on the Small Business Majority,” wrote one critic. Citing the National Federation of Independent Business, she added, “A few years ago, the N.F.I.B. contributed 95% of its PAC money to Republican candidates.” Another offered: “The N.F.I.B. on any piece of legislation will be slanted towards the leanings [of] the paying membership and, thus, not representative the feelings of all small businessmen.”

Not surprisingly, Democrats in Washington tend to agree. “There are lots of small businessmen who are liberal Democrats — they’re not members of the N.F.I.B.,” Bert Carp, a lawyer and veteran Democratic lobbyist, told me in the spring. “Their membership is self-selecting. And they select the issues that they go to their membership on.”

Many people identify the federation as the leading — or at least the loudest — lobby for small business, and its presumed partisan leaning is something I spent a lot of time thinking about this year. In the course of a long look into the organization, I talked to dozens of people: current and former N.F.I.B. lobbyists, current and former aides on Capitol Hill, and other lobbyists. Some of the results of that investigation were published in the September issue of Fortune Small Business, as a study of the N.F.I.B.’s role in the health care debate (including surprising alliances with Democrats and a labor union).

It was in the course of this reporting that I met Denny (born William) Dennis, the head of the N.F.I.B.’s Research Foundation. Mr. Dennis has what may be the messiest office at the N.F.I.B.’s Washington headquarters. His desk, like the bank of file cabinets off to one side, is piled high with binders, spiral-bound reports, and printouts of think-tank studies and surveys. The bookcases behind him are lined with scholarly journals.

Mr. Dennis is responsible for the raft of information that the N.F.I.B. produces about small businesses, including frequent polls and monthly economic reports. He is clearly suited for the work, at ease in a universe of regression models and statistical minutiae. “There has been very little small-business-specific information available,” he said. “It’s not like it’s growing on trees, so we have to develop our own sources frequently.” Besides the research that Mr. Dennis oversees, the organization regularly sends ballots to its members on national controversies affecting small business. The results help shape the N.F.I.B.’s stance. Generally, it won’t take a position on an issue unless it can marshal the support of at least 70, and probably closer to 80, percent of the membership.

The N.F.I.B. uses Mr. Dennis’s mountain of data — evidence that it is simply executing its members’ wishes — as a fortification against the charge that it is nothing more than a wholly owned subsidiary of the G.O.P. And Mr. Dennis insists that N.F.I.B. members believe no differently than small businesses at large. To prove it, he printed off a PowerPoint presentation that compares 500 randomly chosen N.F.I.B. members to 500 small employer firms randomly chosen from the Dun & Bradstreet database. (The Agenda discussed these side-by-side polls here.) To 36 questions on policies and priorities, asked by the polling firm Mason-Dixon, the two samples responded roughly the same, usually conservative by a wide margin. Curiously, the N.F.I.B. sample was slightly more inclined (though still not very inclined) to raise income and payroll taxes for top earners.

What, then, accounts for the entrepreneurs who vote Democratic? As Agenda readers would be the first to tell me, there are many, or at least many more than that N.F.I.B. survey would suggest. In a poll of small-business owners, commissioned by American Express OPEN and taken a year ago, 33 percent of the respondents identified themselves as Republicans and 32 percent called themselves Democrats. Twenty-nine percent said they were independent or claimed no party affiliation. (The sample was taken from a national list of businesses with 100 or fewer employees. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percentage points. A general press release about the poll, which asked respondents about a broad array of issues, is available here.)

Mr. Dennis insisted the surveys are consistent. “We work on economic issues only, and for the most part, small businesses, whether they’re Democrats or Republicans tend to come out on those specific issues much like many of the Republicans do,” he said. “They tend not to want government interference, and they tend not to want high taxes, and all those sorts of things.” Or, as one former N.F.I.B. lobbyist put it, “People join N.F.I.B. because they want somebody in Washington who’s going to say no.”

But, Mr. Dennis added, “there are also a lot of Democrats in the small-business population that, for example, on the social side — which we take no position on at all — prefer the Democrats.” What determines an entrepreneur’s politics, he says, is not what he believes on an issue but how strongly he cares about it. In the OPEN survey, 24 percent of Republicans and 31 percent of those who claim no party affiliation said taxes would have the most influence on their vote, but only 8 percent of Democrats did. Conversely, 15 percent of the Democrats said Iraq was the most important issue, a much higher figure than in any of the other groups.

“The one thing that’s really interesting about small businesses when you poll them is they’re half business, half person,” Mr. Dennis continued. “When you poll big-business guys, they put on their big-business hat and everything is pretty much a business answer. You ask the public and you get a personal answer. We’re in the middle — they clearly are some of both.”

It is as plausible an answer as any The Agenda has heard. And it leads to another important question about the N.F.I.B.: does it represent its members’ interests, or their passions? For that matter, is there a difference? We’ll take that up soon, in another post.

Stimulus plan shortchanges small business

News

Stimulus plan shortchanges small business

Smaller companies are heart of our economy

By Staff Editorial
Bradenton Herald
August 26, 2009

Out of the $787 billion contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a paltry $730 million is being directed to the Small Business Administration to help loosen up the tight credit market.

According to Census Bureau statistics, 98 percent of the country’s companies employ fewer than 100 people yet account for 97 percent of all net new jobs.

And those small businesses provide jobs to 50.2 percent of the private sector workforce and more than 90 percent of technical innovations and patents.

The American Small Business League reports another startling census figure: Large businesses have not created one net new job since 1977.

Small business is getting the very short end of the stimulus stick. Recovery plans fail to adequately address the likely savior of the economy.

Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Longboat Key, discussed that imbalance Thursday at a luncheon with Manatee County business leaders, putting a total stimulus investment in small business at $21 billion — only 3 percent of the total.

“This has been the most anti-small business administration I’ve seen,” he told the gathering.

Looking at the census data, the road to recovery looks like it will be mostly dependent on small business. So why isn’t the Obama administration directing more resources toward the country’s employment and innovation backbone?

One program appears lacking at this point.

The SBA’s effort to unlock the loan market offers incentives to lenders — such as guaranteeing so-called emergency microloans of $35,000 — yet financial institutions remain tight-fisted.

While the banking industry blames excessive SBA red tape, others point to the low profit margin over the six-year life of the $35,000 loans and the resulting reluctance from lenders to get involved.

These emergency bridge loans — budgeted at $255 million of the total SBA allocation of $730 million — could save thousands of small businesses, but only a small percentage of the money has been extended since the program launched in mid-June.

Financial institutions should be considering the long-term viability of local economies, extending these interest-free loans to struggling small companies with the goal of keeping them in business and retaining jobs, all to keep money flowing around a community — and back into bank vaults.

But the SBA should make this program less onerous on lenders, too, by eliminating and streamlining some of the paperwork.

The American Small Business League cites another major problem, this concerning government contracts allocated to small companies but ending up with corporate giants.

Over the past six years, numerous federal investigations found that billions in government contracts earmarked for small business instead went to Fortune 500 companies. The league concluded that the Obama administration’s recovery plans continue that outrageous practice.

The administration and Congress must step up with legislation banning the diversion of small-business contracts to large companies.

Buchanan pledged to seek greater assistance for small businesses in a meeting with the Herald’s Editorial Board. We would expect nothing less from a successful businessman.

If the stimulus package is all about saving and creating jobs, small business must receive far greater attention. As census figures show, as small business goes, so goes America.

Source:  http://www.bradenton.com/opinion/story/1662395.html

What Happened to the Small Business Share of the Federal Pie?

News

What Happened to the Small Business Share of the Federal Pie?

By Kent Bernhard Jr
Portfolio.com
August 26, 2009

Depending on how you look at it, the government missed its small-business contracting goal by a little, or a whole lot.

The government came out with its reckoning of small-business contracts this week and put the value of contracts awarded to small businesses at $93.3 billion in 2008, up $10 billion from 2007, and a record for such contracts. But that number still fell short of the Congressional mandate that 23 percent of government contracts go to small business. Only 21 percent of contracts went to small business, according to the government’s estimate.

Those are the government’s numbers.

But if you listen to advocacy group American Small Business League, the government shortchanged small business by a lot more than 2 percent.

The ASBL says the number’s more like 7 percent of government contracts going to small business. The group points out that since 2003, federal investigations have found that officials regularly cook the books when it comes to reporting small-business contracting, and 2008 was no exception.

The government, the ASBL claims, excludes large contracts as not being “small-business eligible,” taking a big chunk of government contracting out of the accounting for small-business contracts. The group also says some of the firms that made it into the government’s list of small businesses included Lockheed-Martin, Northrop-Grumman, Boeing, and Raytheon. Those are some thriving small businesses, all right.

After analyzing contracting data since 2000, ASBL claims small businesses have lost an average of $100 billion a year in contracts that should have gone to them.

Source:  http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2009/08/26/government-small-business-contracts-miss-the-mark/

Obama Administration Juggles the Books to Shortchange Small Businesses Out of Billions

Press Release

Obama Administration Juggles the Books to Shortchange Small Businesses Out of Billions

August 25, 2009

Petaluma, Calif. - The Obama Administration released its latest small business contracting statistics on August 21, claiming that the federal government awarded 21.5 percent of federal contracts to small businesses. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/20090825TopSmallBusinessContractors2008.pdf)  

The American Small Business League (ASBL) has uncovered information within the Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation (FPDS-NG), which indicates that the government actually did closer to 7 percent with small businesses.

Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have found that federal officials consistently inflated the government's actual small business contracting data, and allowed billions of dollars in federal contracts intended for small businesses to be diverted to corporate giants.

One technique used by the government to misrepresent compliance with the congressionally mandated 23 percent small business contracting goal was to create the term, "small business eligible." Using this technique, government officials subtract larger federal prime contracts from the overall federal acquisition budget. Reducing the actual federal acquisition budget significantly inflates the percentage of all federal contracts awarded to small businesses.

The ASBL points out that excluding large contracts as not being "small business eligible" is not supported by any statute of the law, and is contrary to the actual language of the Small Business Act which states, "The Government-wide goal for participation by small business concerns shall be established at not less than 23 percent of the total value of all prime contract awards for each fiscal year." (http://www.sba.gov/regulations/sbaact/sbaact.html) The ASBL estimates that the actual federal acquisition budget for 2008 was approximately $700 billion. The SBA used a figure of $434 billion to arrive at the 21.5 percent number. (http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/fy2008official_goaling_report.html)  

Another technique, uncovered in federal investigations and used by government officials to misrepresent the actual percentage of federal contracts awarded to small businesses, is to include billions of dollars in contracts to Fortune 500 firms and hundreds of other large businesses as small business awards.

Some of the firms Obama officials used to reach the government's 21.5 percent figure included Lockheed Martin, Textron, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, Northrop Grumman, Dell Computer, General Dynamics, Office Depot, Xerox, 3M, Staples, GTSI, General Electric, AT&T, Hewlett-Packard, British Aerospace (BAE), Rolls-Royce, French giant Thales, Ssangyong Corporation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea and Finmeccanica SpA which is located in Italy with 73,000 employees.

In response to the SBA's release of its 2008 small business goaling report, the ASBL conducted a detailed analysis of small business contracting data obtained from FPDS-NG.  By excluding the large recipients of federal small business contracts and using the actual federal budget from fiscal year 2000 forward, the ASBL has estimated that legitimate American small businesses have lost an average of approximately $100 billion a year in government small business contracts.

A new bill titled the "Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act," or H.R. 2568 has been introduced into the House of Representatives would redirect billions of dollars in federal small business contracts back to legitimate American owned small businesses.

-###-

Please click here to watch our response to the Obama Administration's small business contracting statistics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV0jeTrYPsM

Contact:
Christopher Gunn
Communications Director
American Small Business League
cgunn@asbl.com
(707) 789-9575