Congress Needs To Add Small Business Protection To Lending Bill, ASBL Says

News

Congress Needs To Add Small Business Protection To Lending Bill, ASBL Says

By Resources for Entrepreneurs Staff
Gaebler.com
September 24, 2010

Chapman says federal dollars being misused

One of the leading small business advocacy groups is calling on Congress to prevent funds from the recently passed Small Business Jobs Act from going to some of the largest corporations in the country.

The American Small Business League, in a statement, said that based on his previous campaign promises, President Obama should do everything in his power to ensure that the federal dollars only go to small businesses that are in dire need of capital.

The president of the ASBL, Lloyd Chapman, said that adding the measure came down to simple common sense.

"This is really a no brainer. One sentence could end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants, and put more money into the middle class economy more than anything proposed by the administration or Congress to date," Chapman said. "One sentence could infuse the middle class with more than $100 billion a year:

Chapman has been critical of the federal government in recent weeks. The ASBL president made news for small business by highlighting the fact that many small business contracts from the federal government were winding up in the hands of Fortune 500 companies. 

Source: http://www.gaebler.com/News/Small-Business-Finance/Congress-needs-to-add-small-business-protection-to-lending-bill,-ASBL-says-800082880.htm

Chip Cravaack Responds To Passage Of Small Business Jobs And Credit Act

News

Chip Cravaack Responds To Passage Of Small Business Jobs And Credit Act

By Rick Brock
Rogueon Minnesota
September 24, 2010

In response to the passage of H.R. 5297, the “Small Businesses Jobs and Credit Act,” Chip Cravaack, endorsed Republican candidate for Minnesota’s 8th Congressional District issued the following statement:

    “This bill ignores the real problems that are preventing businesses from creating jobs. If Congressman Oberstar spent less time talking with lobbyists and Washington insiders and more with small business owners in our district, he would know that their main concerns are taxes and the costly regulations imposed on them by Congress.

    If Congressman Oberstar was serious about helping small businesses, he would stop the tax hikes that are set to hit middle class families so they have money to spend and spur economic activity. He would end the costly ObamaCare regulations and mandates, and work for real economic development instead of ‘bringing home the bacon.’

    It doesn’t matter how much money is available for businesses to borrow if people don’t have money to buy their products or services. Without meaningful action to address the issues that are really preventing job growth, we will continue to see numerous cities and counties in our district with unemployment over 10 percent.

    Additionally, the American Small Business League, a bipartisan group, believes that this bill will actually be harmful to job growth and that ‘the potential for harm greatly outweighs any potential for benefit.’

    This so-called ‘small business and jobs’ bill is nothing but political posturing in an election year and does little to help small business owners. Congressman Oberstar claims to support Main Street but he has failed Minnesota’s small businesses.”

Chip Cravaack is a graduate of the United States Naval Academy, retired Navy and Northwest Airlines. He lives in Chisago City with his wife, Traci, and their two sons, Grant and Nick.

Source:  http://www.rogueonminnesota.org/news/chip-cravaack-responds-to-passage-of-small-business-jobs-and-credit-act/

Small-biz loan fund no silver bullet, Charlotte bankers say

News

Small-biz loan fund no silver bullet, Charlotte bankers say

By Adam O'Daniel
Charlotte Business Journal
September 24, 2010

More money. Same problems.

That’s the reaction some bankers and small-business advocates are having to a U.S. Senate bill that will establish a $30 billion fund to help community banks lend more cash to small companies.

The Senate recently approved creation of a Small Business Loan Fund that banks can tap and leverage to make more small-business loans. If the bill is approved by the U.S. House and President Obama as expected, it will allow community banks to borrow from the fund as a way to increase capital, which in turn boosts lending. Banks that lend more will pay smaller dividends on the preferred stock they’ll sell to the government to access the fund.

It’s designed to encourage community banks to improve their small-business lending operations.

Local bankers say any help for small businesses should be applauded. But they aren’t convinced the latest program is a silver bullet. Bankers in Charlotte continue to say the root of the issue is that many small businesses aren’t healthy enough to borrow money — not that banks are stingy or incapable of lending.

Kim Price, chief executive of Gastonia-based Citizens South Bank, says his bank won’t likely participate in the new fund. He says the bank has plenty of capital to support lending. He’s more focused on repaying an earlier government investment from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

“It would just be dumping more money in our pot when we already have plenty,” he says of the Senate’s plan. “The idea that banks can’t or don’t want to lend to credible businesses is inaccurate.”

Bank of Commerce CEO Wes Sturges agrees that poor credit quality is a larger concern for bankers than having enough capital to support lending. His Queens Road-based bank has struggled to find qualified borrowers and recently launched an ad campaign highlighting success stories centered around businesses that received loans from his bank.

Says Sturges: “Why do businesses borrow? To expand the business or hire more people. That’s not happening very much right now. I wish it was.”

Still, he says having a fund capital-depleted banks can tap will be a positive development for struggling lenders.

Proposal too optimistic?

Gary Townsend, chief executive of Hill-Townsend Capital and a national banking expert, contends the Senate’s plan is overly optimistic. He suggests banks will participate in the program, but only as a way to access inexpensive, taxpayer-subsidized capital, not to benefit small-business borrowers.

“The taxpayer subsidy goes to participating community banks, not small-business borrowers, leading cynics to conclude that the SBLF is a political reward for the community bankers’ support of financial reform,” Townsend writes. “If we must subsidize, do it directly to qualifying small business, with greater immediate effect and requisite transparency.”

Chris Gunn, spokesman for the American Small Business League, echoes those sentiments. He says the Senate should put more emphasis on improving the overall climate for small businesses rather than giving banks more money.

“When it comes down to it, there are small businesses that are going to fail regardless, unless they get more customers coming through the doors,” he says. “This bill doesn’t do that.”

‘A better business climate’

Supporters of the lending fund say they realize it won’t solve all woes. But they say it’s a step in the right direction.

U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) held a conference call last week announcing her support of the bill. She cited conversations with small-business owners in North Carolina who have struggled to access credit.

“We have to create a better business climate,” Hagan told reporters. “This is going to get credit flowing to the people who I believe have the ideas that will create jobs in our state.”

Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) voted against the measure.

Hagan points to provisions in the bill that will help small businesses that have low credit scores. For starters, the bill will extend the stimulus-funded Small Business Administration loan programs that expired in May. The biggest piece of that provision is a 90% guarantee on the SBA’s most popular loans to less than credit-worthy borrowers.

Sturges and Price agree the SBA incentives will be positive. “Anything they can do to help us reach borrowers on the fence is a good thing,” Price says.

The small-business bill also includes a cornucopia of tax breaks and incentives for small companies.

Thad Woodard, president of the N.C. Bankers Association says the bill’s elements — when taken as a whole — will likely improve the credit climate and help small banks and their business borrowers. That’s why the NCBA supports the bill.

“Anything that will lubricate small business is necessary and vital at this time,” Woodard says. “It’s the right thing to do.”


aodaniel@bizjournals.com

Source:  http://charlotte.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2010/09/27/story10.html?b=1285560000^3991111


Why The GOP Likes Small Businesses

News

Why The GOP Likes Small Businesses

By Staff
Silver Buzz Cafe
September 23, 2010

There are few issues being debated in the mid-term election season that seem to be as clear cut as the Bush tax cuts debate. President Bush cut taxes for low and middle income families, the rich and small businesses. That sounds fine, until you realize that his administration didn’t make any provisions for making up for the lost revenue. He actually added trillions of Dollars to the deficit, knowing that making up for it wouldn’t be his problem. The Senate passed the cuts using the reconciliation process, so there was an automatic ten year limit on the cuts, which expires this year. If congress does nothing about the cuts, they’ll expire and everyone will see a tax increase, which the  GOP leaders have cast as “the Obama tax increases”. The Democrats are too lily-hearted to hail the event as the end of the “Bush tax deficit fiasco”.

The administration wants to continue the cuts for lower and middle income taxpayers and let the cuts for rich people (those with taxable incomes of above $250,000 a year) and small businesses expire. The GOP immediately leapt to the defense of the rich and the large corporations. However, they put a nice spin on it all. They’ve toned down mentioning the rich and have concentrated on helping small businesses. That sounds really good. Small businesses generate most new jobs, on their way to eventual oblivion or becoming big businesses. So, what’s the problem with defending “small businesses”?

Conflicting facts
The first cracks in the facade were revealed by the following two facts:

  1. Democratic Party line: Just under 3% of small businesses will see a tax increase if the cuts are allowed to expire.
  2. Republican Party line: Small businesses account for about 50% of the revenue from the top two tax brackets.

That’s odd. Both facts are correct, but how can so few “small businesses” generate so much tax revenue? The answer lies in the definition of “small”. Most people think of them as “Mom and Pop” businesses that employ a few people. However, those businesses generally don’t generate enough profit to put them into the top tax brackets. The IRS regards small businesses as ones that don’t file federal taxes directly, but file via the owning shareholders’ individual returns. That allows the billionaire Koch brothers, for instance, to channel the profits from over 600 “small businesses” through personal returns, concealing the true facts about their trillion Dollar business interests. It also allows large corporations with up to 100 owners to file this way (as S-Corporations) and enjoy lower tax rates, averaging around 15%, or about a half of what they’d pay otherwise. About 750,000 individuals are involved in this scam.

It all depends on what you call “small”
The list of “small businesses” contains some very interesting surprises, including:

  • Bechtel: America’s largest civil engineering company, with $31.4 billion in revenue and 44,000 employees worldwide. Bechtel built the Hoover Dam and the Channel Tunnel between the United Kingdom and France.
  • Koch Industries: The second largest privately held company in the United States, with $98 billion in revenue and about 80,000 employees.
  • McIlhenney Company: The Tabasco maker, with $250 million in revenue in 2007 and 200 employees, which brings it closer to the general perception of a small business, but still makes it a big business in fact.
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers: A global accounting firm with $26 billion in revenue in 2009 and over 163,000 employees worldwide.

Small businesses also have an advantage when bidding for federal contracts. However, given that it’s really easy to set up an S-Corporation and label it a small business, there’s a lot of cheating going on. The American Small Business League looked at the top 100 contracts classified as small business contracts for fiscal year 2009. They found that almost two-thirds of the dollars reported as going to federal small business contracts actually went to larger corporations, including AT&T, Dell, General Electric, Hewlett-Packard, Lockheed Martin, Office Depot and Xerox.

Mystery solved
So, it’s easy to explain the apparent contradiction that only 3% of small businesses will be affected by allowing the tax cuts to expire and the 50% of the (top 2 brackets) tax revenue they generate. The small businesses aren’t really small at all. What’s worse is that if their tax cuts are allowed to stay in place they’ll generate a deficit of around $700 billion a year. That’s revenue that the rest of us, the low and middle income taxpayers, will have to make up for. Remember that President Obama lowered the deficit by about 7% last year, after inheriting a $1.7 trillion deficit from President Bush.

As these “small businesses” are actually fronts for extremely rich individuals and large corporations, who tend to donate money to the GOP, it’s easy to see why Republican leaders were eager to jump in and defend them against the interests of the rest of us. Also, with the new Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations to spend freely on political campaigns, the Republicans are currently outspending Democrats by a factor of 7:1 in the mid-term elections. The money is largely being channeled via special interest groups, such as 527s.

Source:  http://silverbuzzcafe.com/?p=13703

Jobs Bill Should Contain Language to Increase Contracting Opportunities for Small Businesses

Press Release

Jobs Bill Should Contain Language to Increase Contracting Opportunities for Small Businesses

September 23, 2010

Petaluma, Calif. – The American Small Business League (ASBL) strongly encourages Congress to add language to H.R. 5297, the Small Business Jobs Act, which would simply halt the diversion of federal small business funds to corporate giants.  The ASBL maintains that ending these abuses would be the most effective and efficient means of stimulating the American economy and creating jobs.

In February of 2008, Barack Obama promised small businesses that if elected president he would, “end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants." (http://www.barackobama.com/2008/02/26/the_american_small_business_le.php)  

President Obama’s campaign promise was based upon a series of federal investigations, which found that Fortune 500 firms and thousands of large businesses in the U.S. and Europe received billions of dollars in federal small business contracts. The first federal investigation was held in May of 2003. Today, large businesses continue to receive billions of dollars in federal contracts intended for small businesses.

The most recent information released by the Obama Administration indicates that of the top 100 recipients of federal small business contracts, 65 percent of the dollars actually went to large businesses.(https://www.asbl.com/documents/ASBL_2009_dataanalysis.pdf)

The federal government has a goal of awarding 23 percent of all government contracts to small businesses.  The ASBL has estimated that the government is currently awarding less than 5 percent of its purchases to small businesses.  Ending the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants could increase the volume of government dollars awarded to small businesses by more than 18 percent.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, small businesses are responsible for more than 90 percent of all net new jobs, 50.2 percent of the non-farm private sector workforce, 50 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) and 90 percent of exports and innovations. (http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/rs359.pdf)
In April of 2010, U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship Chair, Mary L. Landrieu (D-LA), estimated that increasing contracts to small businesses by just 1 percent would create more than 100,000 new jobs.  Based on this estimate, ending this fraud and abuse could create more than 1.8 million new jobs. (www.smallbusinessmajority.org/_docs/resources/SBC_Jobs_Package.pdf)   

“This is really a no brainer.  One sentence could end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants, and put more money into the middle class economy more than anything proposed by the administration or Congress to date,” ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said.  “One sentence, could infuse the middle class with more than $100 billion a year: ‘The public can no longer report awards to publicly traded firms as small business awards.’ ”

-###-