U.S. small-business spending disputed

News

U.S. small-business spending disputed

By Jan Norman
OC Register
August 31, 2010

The federal government spent a record $96.8 billion with U.S. small businesses in the 2009 fiscal year, according to an annual report from the U.S. Small Business Administration.

However, a major critic of federal small-business contracting calls the report "dramatically inflated."

However, the report is flawed in two ways, according to Lloyd Chapman, president of the American Small Business League in Petaluma. He claims:

    * It includes billions of dollars in contracts that actually went to large corporations.

    * The calculations are based on $500 billion in spending when the real federal acquisition budget is $1 trillion.

 

The SBA acknowledges that the federal government missed its goal for small-business spending in four of the five categories, but in each category the spending increased.

SBA Administrator Karen Mills said the report "represents real progress, but not enough. We must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23% goal is met and exceeded."

Chapman said that his organization had analyzed 2009 small-business contracting data and found "the actual percentage of contracts awarded to small businesses is closer to 5%...Of the top 100 recipients of federal small-0business contracts...60 large firms received 64.5% of the total dollars the government claimed to have awarded to small business.

"The ASBL also identified a series of Fortune 500 corporations and other large firms in the government's 2009 contracting data...including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace, Northrop Grumman, General Elect4ric, Booz Allen Hamilton, Thales Communications, General Dynamics and Dell Computer," Chapman added.

There’s no legal requirement to give contracts to small businesses, but since 1953, the federal government has encouraged its biggest agencies to spend some money with the little guys that account for half the nation’s gross domestic product, more than half the jobs and more than half the net NEW jobs.

Chapman has been insisting for years — through the administrations of both political parties — that these reports are at best mistaken and at worst fraudulent and involve “$100 billion a year.” He created the league to call public attention to the issue.

In the past, the SBA has attributed the issue to data-entry mistakes, to companies winning contracts while they were small but then outgrowing the limit and to multi-year contracts automatically renewed for as long a s 20 years if a business did a good job.

It’s not that the definition of a small business is so restrictive.  In some industry categories, a company can have 1,500 employees or $35.5 million in annual revenues.

Source: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/small-264417-business-report.html

Government Falls Short of Small Business Contracting Goals

News

Government Falls Short of Small Business Contracting Goals

Small firms won a record amount in government contracts last year, but it wasn't enough to reach a target set by Congress.

By Courtney Rubin
Inc.com
August 31, 2010

Small businesses nationwide won a record $96.8 billion in federal contracts last year, an increase of more than $3 billion over fiscal 2008, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration's most recent scorecard. However, it still wasn't enough to reach a goal set by Congress.

Small business contracts accounted for 21.9 percent of federal spending last year – up from 21.5 percent the year before. Congress set a goal of 23 percent goal.

"There was an increase in both dollars and contracting share for every small-business category," SBA Administrator Karen Mills said in a statement. "This represents real progress, but not enough. We must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23 percent [of all federal spending] goal is met and exceeded."

The work small businesses did included scientific research, technological support -- and even janitorial services.

By law, the government must keep tabs on its efforts to offer contracts to businesses in five categories: small businesses overall, women-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and HUB Zone businesses, or those in historically underutilized business zones (economically distressed areas).

Of those categories, only one – small disadvantaged businesses – exceeded its goal for fiscal year 2009. Its contracts made up 7.6 percent of all federal funding in 2009, or $33.5 billion. The category's goal was 5 percent. "Disadvantaged" companies are those owned by people who have had economic disadvantages and are members of certain ethnic and racial groups.

Last year, the government awarded $16.3 billion in contracts (3.4 percent of federal spending) to small companies owned by women. That's $1.6 billion more than in 2008 but still short of the 5 percent goal.

The scorecard grades the efforts of 24 agencies. The overall federal government received a B.

The Energy, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs department – and the SBA itself – received top marks. The Office of Personnel Management, Agency for International Development, and the National Science Foundation earned failing grades.

In comments attached to the scorecard, poorly ranked agencies justified their low marks. The General Services Administration, which received a C, noted that its goal for small business contracts was 35.7 percent, much higher than that for the entire federal government. (27 percent of GSA contracts went to small businesses.) Just 8 percent of USAID's contract dollars went to small businesses – earning the agency a failing grade – but that's because the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief required it to buy a lot of drugs, the agency said.

The American Small Business League, a California-based advocacy group that has previously accused the government of misrepresentation, challenged the SBA figures. According to the league's June analysis of the top 100 recipients of federal business contracts in fiscal 2009, some 65 percent of the money went to large companies that in some cases were members of the Fortune 500. Based on that sample, the proportion of contract dollars going to small business is closer to 5 percent, the league said Monday.

-###-

Obama Ignores Prime Opportunity to Help Prevent Double Dip Recession

Press Release

Obama Ignores Prime Opportunity to Help Prevent Double Dip Recession

August 30, 2010

As I predicted in my August 6th and August 24th Huffington Post blogs, President Barack Obama has decided to continue the Bush Administration policy of diverting billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts to Fortune 500 firms and corporate giants around the world. He has also continued the Bush Administration policy of waiting eleven months after the end of the fiscal year to release the small business contracting data, and then issue the press release late Friday afternoon to limit media coverage and scrutiny of the data.

The tactic works quite well in slashing media coverage. It is unlikely you will see any coverage of the issue in the mainstream media. You will not see a single White House Correspondent asking tough questions about the data.

Most importantly, President Obama has missed his best opportunity to really stimulate the economy and create millions of new jobs by redirecting over $100 billion a year in existing federal infrastructure spending to America's 27 million small businesses. Small businesses are the backbone of the U.S. Economy, creating a majority of net new jobs. If President Obama had chosen to end the Bush Administration policy of diverting federal small business contracts to corporate giants, it would have done more to prevent a double dip recession than any existing stimulus program.

Compare President Obama's one time shot $30 billion small business lending bill to a policy that would redirect over $100 billion a year in existing federal infrastructure spending directly into the private sector for decades to come.

An analysis by the American Small Business League (ASBL) found that of the top 100 recipients of Obama Administration small business contracts, 60 were large businesses, which received 65 percent of the funds awarded to those firms. Some of the firms the Obama Administration considered to be small business included, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace (BAE), Northrop Grumman, General Electric, Booz Allen Hamilton, Thales Communications, General Dynamics, and Dell Computer. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/ASBL_2009_dataanalysis.pdf)

In addition to diverting billions of dollars a year in federal small business contracts to many of the largest firms in the world; Obama officials overstated the percentage of awards to small business by as much as 300 percent. This inflation was accomplished by dramatically under reporting the actual federal acquisition budget. The actual federal acquisition budget is over $1 trillion when taking into account all foreign and domestic acquisitions and all classified and unclassified acquisitions. In calculating the percentage of awards to small businesses, Obama officials used an acquisition budget figure that is less than half of the real number.

Federal law requires a minimum of 23 percent of all federal contracts to be awarded to small businesses. Based on the actual language in the Small Business Act, American small businesses should receive a minimum of $230 billion in federal contracts each year.

Using the actual federal acquisition budget, and by excluding firms that would not currently qualify as small businesses, the Obama Administration awarded less than 5 percent of all federal contracts to legitimate small businesses.

Depending on the data you use, small businesses are responsible for between 66 percent and 97 percent of all net new jobs in America. A report by the Kaufman Foundation found that nearly all net new jobs were created by firms that were less than 5-years-old. According to US Census Bureau data, 98 percent of all U.S. firms have less than 100 employees. These 27 million firms employ over 50 percent of the private sector workforce and generate over 50 percent of the gross domestic product. They are also responsible for over 90 percent of all U.S. exports and over 90 percent of innovations.

Any economist will tell you, redirecting existing federal infrastructure spending to America's job creators is the best way to stimulate the nation's faltering economy and create millions of net new jobs.

President Obama could achieve this by issuing an executive order or by having the Small Business Administration (SBA) adopt policies to halt the diversion of federal small business funds to large businesses. He could also support H.R. 2568, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act. H.R. 2568 is based on language in the Small Business Act, which defines a small business as being "independently owned," which literally means not publicly traded firms. H.R. 2568 is a seven and a half page bill that simply states the federal government can no longer report awards to publicly traded firms as small business awards. H.R. 2568 is a free and easy economic stimulus bill, which is deficit neutral. It is a perfect solution that would end a decade's worth of small business contracting abuses, while at the same time stimulating the national economy.

Any politician that will stand by as our national economy slips closer to another recession by allowing the continued diversion of billions of dollars a year in federal small business contracts to corporate giants, should be thrown out of office as soon as possible, and we will have our chance to in November.

 

 

 

 

 


 

Obama Tries to Downplay Questionable Small Business Data

Press Release

Obama Tries to Downplay Questionable Small Business Data

August 30, 2010

Petaluma, Calif. – The Obama Administration has released its fiscal year (FY) 2009 Small Business Procurement Scorecard, reporting that the government missed its 23 percent small business contracting goal.  In its scorecard, the government claimed to have awarded a mere 21.89 percent to small businesses, while also failing to meet congressionally mandated contracting goals for women, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses and HUBZone firms.  The Obama Administration missed 4 of its 5 contracting goals. (http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100827005701/en)  

The American Small Business League (ASBL) maintains that based on a recent evaluation of FY 2009 small business contracting data, the actual percentage of contracts awarded to small businesses is closer to 5 percent.  In June, the ASBL conducted a review of the top 100 recipients of federal small business contracts for FY 2009. Within its sample, the ASBL identified 60 large firms, which received 64.5 percent of the total dollars the government claimed to have awarded to small businesses. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/ASBL_2009_dataanalysis.pdf)

The ASBL also identified a series of Fortune 500 corporations and other large firms in the government’s 2009 contracting data. Recipients of small business contracts included: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace (BAE), Northrop Grumman, General Electric, Booz Allen Hamilton, Thales Communications, General Dynamics, and Dell Computer.

Since 2003, more than a dozen federal investigations have found billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts flowing into the hands of corporate giants. (https://www.asbl.com/documentlibrary.html)  

The ASBL believes the Obama Administration has dramatically inflated the percentage of contracts awarded to small businesses by under-reporting the actual federal acquisition budget and by including billions of dollars in contracts awarded to large businesses.  The actual federal acquisition budget for foreign, domestic, classified and unclassified projects is roughly $1 trillion. The Obama Administration’s goaling achievement is based on a number that is less than half of the actual federal acquisition budget.

As the American Small Business League predicted, the Obama Administration released its FY 2009 small business contracting numbers near the close of business on Friday afternoon.  The late release of data is a clear indication the Obama Administration was trying to avoid scrutiny form the mainstream media. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lloyd-chapman/obama-administration-fabr_b_693359.html, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lloyd-chapman/obama-administration-will_b_674073.html)  

“President Obama is not fooling anyone.  These 5 o’clock Friday afternoon press releases are like sending up a signal flare that the data is fabricated,” ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said.  “Every year billions of dollars in federal contracts are diverted to Fortune 500 corporations and other large businesses, and every year the government fabricates its numbers.  It is time for Congress and the Obama Administration to pass H.R. 2568, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, and end this abuse once and for all.”

-###-


SBA says federal agencies fell short of small-business lending goal

News

SBA says federal agencies fell short of small-business lending goal

By Beth Fitzgerald
NJBIZ.com
August 30, 2010

U.S. small businesses received a record $96.8 billion in federal prime contracts in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2009, or 21.89 percent of federal contracts — falling short of the government’s goal to award 23 percent of its contracts to small business, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration.

The $3.6 billion increase for small business in 2009 “represents real progress, but not enough — we must reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that the 23 percent goal is met and exceeded,” said Karen Mills, SBA administrator. The percentage was up slightly from 21.5 percent in fiscal 2008.

The SBA also released its annual scorecard of how well individual federal agencies did toward meeting their small-business contracting goals. The federal government got a grade of B overall; on an individual basis, several agencies outdid others: Department of Defense, B; Energy, A; NASA, C; Interior, A; Justice, D; and the General Services Administration, C. The grade of A was awarded to Transportation, Agriculture, EPA, Education, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security, SBA and Veterans Affairs. The following agencies got a B: Treasury, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, State, and the Social Security Administration.

“The good news is that the percentage and the dollars went up,” said Jim Kocsi, SBA district director for New Jersey. He said  publicizing the scores of agencies “has shined a light a little more on individual agencies and gives them a bit more of a stimulus to do better — and Congress is watching this, too.”

Kocsi said total contract spending by federal agencies was $442.2 billion in fiscal 2009. Figures were not broken out by state.

Dolcey Chaplin, who heads the Procurement Technical Assistance Center at New Jersey Institute of Technology, in Newark, said there is a trend for the federal government to do more work in-house, which she said reduces the contract opportunities for small business to provide. In the 2009 fiscal year, she said the PTAC, which helps businesses statewide land government contracts, advised about 1,000 New Jersey businesses that received about $200 million in contracts.

From her dealings with the federal government, Chaplin said, “they really want to make their small-business contract goals, and they work very hard at it.” She said the government’s 21.89 percent of small-business contracting “is very good in this environment.”

Lidija Erazo, small-business specialist for the Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurt, said the base “buys anything and everything: construction, engineering, design, uniforms, products — everything we need to do our jobs.” She said the base is required to purchase from small businesses, and she encouraged small businesses to get into the online procurement system, at www.fbo.gov, to find opportunities to sell to the government.

The American Small Business League said its analysis shows the federal government continues to incorrectly identify large businesses as small-business contractors, thus inflating the small-business numbers.

“Every year, billions of dollars in federal contracts are diverted to Fortune 500 corporations and other large businesses,” said ASBL President Lloyd Chapman,

The government has said the miscoding of contracts is a significant problem that it is addressing.



E-mail Beth Fitzgerald at bfitzgerald@njbiz.com

Source:  http://www.njbiz.com/other-news/83402-sba-says-federal-agencies-fell-short-of-small-business-lending-goal