Small Business Administration needs to be reined in says Velazquez

News

Small Business Administration needs to be reined in says Velazquez

By Doug Caldwell
Central Valley Business Times
March 3, 2011

•  Top Dem on small biz committee says SBA may be wasting money
•  ‘Fraud by borrowers, loan agents, lenders, and other participants in SBA business loan programs’

The U.S. Small Business Administration is shoveling scare money into pet projects that are unauthorized, says Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Committee on Small Business.

“I am troubled by the agency's continued use of scarce budget authority to fund unauthorized pilot programs,” she says. “These programs were launched without the public hearings and legislative record that accompanies statutorily authorized programs. Therefore, it is impossible to understand why these programs were created and whether or not they are a good investment for the taxpayer.”

Ms. Velazquez cited seven such programs:

• The Small Loan Advantage program
• The Community Advantage program
• The Impact Investing fund
• The Early Stage Innovation fund,
• Regional Clusters
• The Distance Learning Portal, and,
• The Emerging Leaders program.



“The cost of the last three alone makes up nearly 10 percent of the SBA's non-credit programs budget submission,” she says. “In addition, several of these programs are clearly duplicative of other agency offerings. The reality is that these are lean times – everyone has to tighten their belt. And this includes the SBA.”

Calling them “pet projects,” she says the SBA should instead be focusing on addressing the priorities raised by its own Inspector General.

One of those is the awarding of federal small business contracts to companies that should not be eligible.

"In 2009, $97 billion in prime contacts were awarded through these programs. However, IG audits, as well as GAO [Government Accountability Office] investigations, have identified numerous instances where firms that do not meet these program's eligibility criteria, but were improperly given contracts anyway,” she says.

She also says the SBA’s major loan program is riddled with problems.

Citing the Inspector General, she says the SBA “faces a heightened risk of loss” due to expedited loan processing initiatives and its “considerable reliance” on outside financial institutions.

The majority of loans made under the SBA’s 7(a) program are made with little or no review by SBA prior to loan approval because the agency has delegated most of the credit decisions to lenders, Ms. Velazquez says. “Numerous IG criminal investigations have identified fraud by borrowers, loan agents, lenders, and other participants in SBA business loan programs.”

 

 Source: http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=17782

Small Biz Group Wants Access To Bechtel Contract Info

News

Small Biz Group Wants Access To Bechtel Contract Info

By Mike Cherney
Law360
March 2, 2011

Law360, New York (March 2, 2011) -- Citing cpncerns that big government contractors are not giving enough work to small businesses, the California-based American Small Business League wants the U.S. Army to release information on contracts awarded to global engineering firm Bechtel Corp.

The league filed a lawsuit Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California saying the Army violated the Freedom of Information Act by refusing to release uncensored versions of reports detailing which companies Bechtel subcontracted with to perform government work.

Federal law requires 23 percent of all contracts to be awarded to small businesses, and each federal agency sets small business subcontracting goals in conjunction with the U.S. Small Business Administration. The ASBL suspects Bechtel and the Army could be cooperating to circumvent these rules.

The ASBL says it is gathering information on several major government contractors, and could launch additional lawsuits under the False Claims Act and the Small Business Act.

Kevin Baron, the director of government affairs for the league, said the Army released redacted versions of the Bechtel subcontracting reports. But the reports censored the dollar amount and percentages that small business subcontractors were receiving, which Baron said was the key information.

The league requested two types of subcontracting reports — an individual subcontracting report, which details the Bechtel subcontractors on one specific contract, and the most recent summary subcontracting report, which details subcontractors on all government contracts awarded to Bechtel.

The individual subcontracting report related to a $100 million deal with the Army's Joint Munitions Command in Rock Island, Ill., for hazardous waste treatment and disposal, Baron said. Bechtel has performed that work for the Army since at least 2005, at a cost of $804 million, Baron said.

Baron said the league is confident the court will order the Army to turn over the subcontracting reports, noting that the organization has won more than half a dozen similar FOIA suits in the past.

In 1992, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the subcontracting reports could be released to the public and did not contain proprietary information.

Lloyd Chapman, the president of the ASBL, blasted President Barack Obama in a statement Tuesday, saying that despite Obama's promises to have the most transparent administration in history, his administration continues to withhold even the simplest information on federal small business contracts.

“Any time the Obama administration withholds information that has always been released to the public, it shows us that we have found evidence of contracting fraud and abuse,” Chapman said. “I am confident that's what we will find with this information.”

In a study on government contracts for fiscal year 2009, the league determined that 65 percent of the total volume of contract dollars coded as going to small businesses actually went to large corporations. The study reviewed the top 100 recipients of federal small business contracts.

The government awarded $16.6 billion in small business contracts in fiscal year 2009, but $10.7 billion of that amount went to large companies, according to the league's study. The league said its results showed the government is inflating the achievements of its small business goal by diverting billions of dollars in small business contracts to large companies.

The league is represented in the current FOIA suit by Gutierrez & Associates.

The case is American Small Business League v. U.S. Department of the Army, case number 11-955, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

source: http://www.law360.com/california/articles/229198





Army Sued for Refusing to Release Bechtel Contracting Data

Press Release

Army Sued for Refusing to Release Bechtel Contracting Data

March 2, 2011

Petaluma, Calif. –The U.S. Department of the Army is being sued by the American Small Business League (ASBL) for refusing to release subcontracting reports on contracts awarded to multinational defense giant Bechtel. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/Complaint_SBA_FOIA_ArmyBechtel.pdf)  

The ASBL filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California on Tuesday, March 1. The case was filed after the Army repeatedly refused to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISR) and Summary Subcontracting Reports (SSR) on a prime contract awarded to Bechtel.

The ASBL believes the information contained in the reports may show that Bechtel and the Army cooperated in an effort to circumvent federal law, which requires 23 percent of all federal contracts to be awarded to small businesses. The ASBL is gathering information on several major government prime contractors in preparation for litigation that may include cases filed under the False Claims Act, and Section 16(d) of the Small Business Act.
In 1992, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that subcontracting reports are releasable to the public, and do not contain trade secret or proprietary information.

The ASBL has won a series of lawsuits against the federal government under FOIA. Some of the information obtained by the ASBL indicates the federal government may have diverted small business contracts to Bechtel and some of the largest corporations on earth. The Obama Administration is currently awarding small business contracts to firms such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, British Aerospace (BAE), Northrop Grumman, and Dell Computer. (www.asbl.com/documents/ASBL_2009_dataanalysis.pdf)  

To date, the ASBL has five outstanding lawsuits in the federal court system. (https://www.asbl.com/documentlibrary.html)  

“President Obama promised to have the most transparent administration in history, yet his administration continues to withhold even the simplest information on federal small business contracting programs. As I have said many times before, there is a big difference between what President Obama says and what President Obama does,” ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said. “Any time the Obama Administration withholds information that has always been released to the public, it shows us that we have found evidence of contracting fraud and abuse. I am confident that’s what we will find with this information.”

-###-

Obama Ignores Simple Solution to Supercharge Job Creation

Press Release

Obama Ignores Simple Solution to Supercharge Job Creation

February 24, 2011

Petaluma, Calif. – Despite national unemployment above 9 percent, and a continued jobless recovery, the Obama Administration has refused to make good on a campaign promise to end the diversion of billions of dollars a month in federal small business contracts to corporate giants.  As a result, the nation’s chief job creators, small businesses, are forced to compete head-to-head against Fortune 500 firms and other large businesses for even the smallest orders for goods and services.

Federal law requires the U.S. government to direct 23 percent of its purchases to small businesses.  Yet every year, a vast majority of federal small business contracts go to some of the biggest companies around the world.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, small businesses create more than 90 percent of net new jobs, are responsible for 50 percent of the gross domestic product, 50.2 percent of the private sector workforce, and 90 percent of exports and innovations. Given the clear impact of small businesses on the nation’s economy, the American Small Business League (ASBL) maintains that it is unreasonable for the Obama Administration to continue ignoring this damaging widespread abuse. (http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/re359.pdf)  

Since 2003, a series of federal investigations have shown that an overwhelming majority of federal small business contracts actually go to Fortune 500 firms and even some of the largest corporations on earth. The most recent data released by the Obama Administration shows recipients of federal small business contracts including: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Dell Computer, Xerox, SAIC, General Dynamics, Bechtel and John Deere. (https://www.asbl.com/documents/05-15.pdf; www.asbl.com/documents/ASBL_2009_dataanalysis.pdf)

The ASBL maintains that the most effective way to supercharge job creation and stimulate the economy is to pass the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act.  If passed, the bill would end widespread abuse in small business programs and direct billions of dollars in existing federal spending to the nation’s 27 million small businesses.  The ASBL expects the bill to be reintroduced into the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Hank Johnson (D-GA) shortly.  (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2568/show )

“Passing the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act would create more jobs than anything proposed by the Obama Administration to date.  It’s simple, easy, deficit neutral and would provide the nation’s chief job creators with significantly increased access to federal contracting opportunities,” ASBL President Lloyd Chapman said. “It is time for President Obama to keep his promise and ‘end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants.’ ”

-###-

Contract cancellation pulls rug out from under Bethesda small business

News

Contract cancellation pulls rug out from under Bethesda small business

By Marjorie Censer
Washington Post
February 21, 2011

After 19 years running her own information technology business, Laura Glynn is facing an uncertain future since the Department of Health and Human Services cut short a major contract.

Glynn, president and chief executive of Bethesda-based Glynn Technologies, said her company earned $5.65 million for more than two years' work managing Web sites for the agency. Now, her once 20-person firm is down to just four employees and she is trying to find commercial work as she struggles to rebuild the company.

Her predicament demonstrates the struggle faced by many smaller government contractors, some of which rely on just one or two contracts. As the budget shrinks, industry advocates say, these companies become even more vulnerable.

"There are very few small businesses that are able to handle a lot of . . . contracts," said Kevin Baron, director of government affairs at the American Small Business League. Instead if they can lock on to a few "good contracts that can sustain them for quite some time."

Glynn started her company when she was in her 20s. Glynn Technologies helped develop the y2k.gov site for the Clinton administration and the Obama administration's whitehouse.gov site, she said.

But what has sustained the company in recent years was long-term work operating and maintaining a set of Health and Human Services Web sites, including hhs.gov, flu.gov, healthreform.gov and others. After three years overseeing the sites, Glynn Technologies received a follow-on contract in 2008 to continue for up to five more years.

Even though Glynn's company received high marks in a late-2009 performance review, HHS informed Glynn in the summer of 2010 that it would not be exercising the additional option years and would instead recompete the contract.

In a statement, the department said the decision to end the contract "was based entirely on the Department's increased needs, which were not included in the contract and could not be awarded to Glynn Technologies on a non-competitive basis."

After Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) contacted HHS in support of Glynn, the department responded that Glynn, while given an opportunity to bid on the new contract, did not submit her offer before the deadline. Consequently, "the proposal could not be evaluated."

Glynn denied turning in the proposal late and said the government has not been able to document it.

She's not the only one facing a more uncertain contracting environment. Small-business advocates warn that the government will need to pay close attention to ensure policy changes, like moving more work in-house, and budget cuts don't disproportionately hurt small businesses.

"Clearly if you're small, any change or any perturbation has a greater impact," said Stan Soloway, president and chief executive of the Professional Services Council, a contractor trade group.

Glynn said she is now trying to pick up the pieces, building a social media site with some paid content. Additionally, Glynn Technologies has some work with commercial financial institutions and is teaming with other companies in pursuit of government contracts.

"My goal is to survive," said Glynn. "But I have to definitely rebuild, and I am pretty much starting from scratch."

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/18/AR2011021805782.html