SBA Loses Expertise with Retirements

News

SBA Loses Expertise with Retirements

By Jerry Siebenmark
Wichita Business Journal
October 9, 2400

Beth Harshfield says she's concerned that her company will lose out on some government contracts now that two experienced people have left the Wichita Small Business Administration office.

On Sept. 30, Iris Newton, a 16-year business opportunity specialist in minority enterprise development, put in her last day at SBA. She was among 120 people in the agency to take the early retirement buyout, the second buyout in the past year, says Elizabeth Auer, SBA's Wichita District director.

In March, Ed Poindexter, an expert in government contracting and working with disadvantaged businesses, also took a buyout.

Their departures come after agency budget cuts.

Harshfield, owner of Exhibit Arts LLC, says she worries that the cuts are taking away the expertise she's relied on to win government contracts.

Auer says the departure of Newton, who took over Poindexter's role in working with disadvantaged businesses and government contracting, will, for a short time, affect the office's ability to serve clients.

"But as people get trained and familiar with the program areas, we'll get back up to speed," Auer says.

Harshfield fears that in the interim, some contracts will bypass her firm and the 14 others that are in the SBA's 8(a) program that helps socially and economically disadvantaged businesses.

Auer says it's not a given that an 8(a) company will be flush with government contracts, or that the SBA's job is to seek out and steer contracts their way. But Harshfield says Poindexter and Newton organized events where 8(a) companies could pitch their services to contracting officers from federal agencies. They would also seek out contracts.

"Even the last week (Newton) was here she notified me of a potential opportunity," Harshfield says. "They were basically working out there to bring contracts to 8(a) businesses and other businesses."

Cleo Littleton, an 8(a) graduate in 2004, says he depended upon Poindexter's and Newton's expertise and contacts whenever his company, Litco Inc., had problems with one of its government contracts.

Auer says there was little time to train Newton's replacements, who already hold other job duties. Pat Carney is taking over the 8(a) program, and Vanessa Klein has Newton's spokeswoman and women's business ownership representative duties.

The buyouts come as the agency's budget continues to be trimmed, from $1.1 billion in fiscal year 2001 to $593 million in FY 2006. In that same period, agency-wide employment has fallen from 3,315 to 2,813: Locally it's declined from 21 to 12.

Auer says Newton was able to spend some time training her replacements. Auer is arranging for them to travel to another SBA district office for additional training.





Small Business Advocate's List Shows Many Large Firms Getting Set Asides

News

Small Business Advocate's List Shows Many Large Firms Getting Set Asides

By Charles S. Clark
Government Executive
October 9, 1600

The gadfly American Small Business League's new annual list of Fortune 500companies it argues are grabbing undeserved federal contracts includes suchhousehold names as Verizon, Wellpoint, Target and Boeing.

"Year after year, large corporations illegally receive billions of dollarsin small business contracts intended for legitimate small businesses," said a recentrelease from the Petaluma, Calif.,-based league run by Lloyd Chapman.

Among the top 179 federal contract award winners in fiscal 2014, by theleague's analysis, were Verizon Communications ($125,949,391); WellPoint($27,092,843); Boeing ($7,596,087); Raytheon ($3,878,029);IBM ($3,379,118);General Dynamics ($2,577,577); United Technologies ($2,498,067); andLockheed Martin ($2,441,197).

The league has long attackedthe Small Business Administration's methodology for determining who qualifiesas a small business and is hence eligible for set-asides that every agency isunder mandate to honor.

The SBA, while taking no position on the league's methodology, argued in aFriday statement that legitimate small firms might appear as large ones becauseof the growth of a business, mergers and acquisitions, or human data entryerror by a contracting officer. "SBA has no tolerance for fraud,waste and abuse, and takes corrective steps when actionable information comesto light," an official said. "Over the past seven years, SBA has initiated moregovernmentwide suspension and debarment actions than in the previous 10years. The fact that a contract awarded to a large business is coded in adatabase as an award to a small business does not mean that the contract wastaken away from a small business or that small businesses suffered."

To view full article, click here: http://www.govexec.com/contracting/2015/07/small-business-advocates-list-shows-many-large-firms-getting-set-asides/117544/


Small Business Contracts Flow to Mega Corporations

News

Small Business Contracts Flow to Mega Corporations

By Brianna Ehley
The Fiscal Times
October 9, 1600

ByBrianna Ehley, The FiscalTimes

 

August19, 2014

 

Behemothcorporations like Apple, Bank of America and General Electric are scooping upfederal contracts that are intended for small businesses, an advocacy groupmaintains.  

TheAmerican Small Business League reviewed procurement data for 2013 and foundthat only 16 of 100 companies receiving the highest valued contracts wereactually small firms, Government Executive first reported.

Related: Defense Cuts Increase Risksfor Small Businesses

Meanwhile,79 of the 100 companies receiving the largest contracts were huge corporations,including defense contractors Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics and Boeing.Other companies taking federal small business contracts include Citigroup andBank of America, as well as Apple and Oracle. Five companies were anomalous,the group said.

VIDEO HERE

"Onceagain, large companies are the fraudulent recipients of a large portion offederal small business contracts," the group's president, Lloyd Chapman said ina statement. "This practice is disastrous to our economy and hurting theAmerican people."

Thegovernment is supposed to award 23 percent of total contracts to smallbusinesses – though it's not required to do so by law. And according to theSmall Business Administration (SBA), it has missed that target every year sinceat least 2006. In 2012, for example, the government awarded $89.9 billion incontracts to small businesses, or roughly 22 percent of total contracts,Bloomberg noted. The governmentawarded small businesses just 21.6 percent of total contracts in 2011.

Related: Pentagon Has No Idea What108,000 Contractors Are Doing

The SBA,however, argued that in some instances, small businesses might not beidentified that way in the Federal Procurement Data System. John Shoraka told GovExec that if acontract was awarded to a large business, it doesn't mean it was taken awayfrom a small business "or that small businesses suffered."

"Unless acontract was set aside for a small business, the designation as a smallbusiness does not benefit that business in receiving the award," Shoraka said.He added that the designation could be the result of a mistake on the part ofthe contracting officer, who actually enters the designation in the database,or the firm "when filing its representation for that contract."

The SBAoffers a "protest" process in case businesses were inaccurately identified.

"SBA cannotalter the federal procurement data that has been [entered] into FPDS," Shorakasaid. "However, we are continuously taking steps to improve dataintegrity. Each agency is responsible for ensuring the quality of its owncontracting data."

Related: Tax Exempt Groups Owe IRSNearly $1 Billion

Theconcern of big firms snatching small business contracts is nothing new.

Last year,Congress approved legislation within the National Defense Authorization Actaimed at reforming how contracts flowed to small businesses. The measure,signed into law by President Obama, changes the way contractors can count theamount of subtracting dollars they pass onto smaller firms.

HouseSmall Business Committee Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO) applauded the passage ofhis committee's legislation at the time, saying, "The purpose of the federalcontracting goal is to ensure small businesses get a fair opportunity."

However, aspokesperson for the House Committee on Small Business said the SBA is"dragging its feet on finalizing the rule."

To view full article, click here: http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/08/19/Small-Business-Contracts-Flow-Mega-Corporations#sthash.Vo8b5f26.dpuf


DISA awards contract to company with history of fraud

News

DISA awards contract to company with history of fraud

By Amber Corrin
Federal Computer Week
October 9, 1600

The Defense Information Systems Agency is defending its decision to award a $578 million contract to Red River Computer to provide IT equipment and services – services strikingly similar to some of those Red River was last year fined more than $2 million for failing to provide to government agencies.
 
According to an FBI release, the Claremont, N.H.-based reseller of information technology products and services was forced to pay $2.3 million amid allegations of violating the False Claims Act in doing business with a number of federal agencies. Those agencies include the Defense, Commerce and Interior departments, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Library of Congress and the General Services Administration.
Breck Taylor, a company co-founder and former president who admitted to some of the charges, parted ways with the company several years ago, according to reports.
 
Red River was accused of failing to provide IT systems and services on a number of different contracts. One item on the list includes a 2005 contract with the Army that called for Red River to provide Cisco SMARTNet; the company reportedly did not complete registration for services with Cisco and in turn received a partial refund, which it did not reimburse to the Army.
The DISA contract awarded to Red River in late June includes provisions for Cisco SMARTNet capabilities, which according to a Nextgov report, the military heavily relies on. A DISA spokesperson said DOD is confident in their processes for adequately vetting contractors and awarding contracts.
 
“For every procurement, DITCO [DISA’s Defense Information Technology Contracting Office] performs requisite background research using established government-approved databases including the Excluded Parties List System and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System,” a DISA spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement. “In this case, DITCO followed established procedures and made a responsibility determination as required by Federal Acquisition Regulation 9.104. In addition, all companies that submitted a bid were not listed as debarred or excluded.”
 

According to a release from the Justice Department, Taylor, “admitted that he arranged for Red River to enter into a contract in which the Army paid over $48,000 to obtain services for certain Cisco products at Fort Bragg. However, Red River did not register for all of the services and Taylor arranged for Red River to receive a refund. Taylor never told the Army about the refund and did not refund the money to the government.”
In the weeks after the fine was levied last year, Taylor entered a plea agreement pleading guilty to charges that he defrauded nearly $1.1 million from government agencies, according to the Concord, N.H., Valley News. He was sentenced to three years and prison and ordered to pay $443,000 in restitution, roughly the same amount as he gained from the fraudulent activities, the Valley News reported.
 
The newspaper also reported that Red River said Taylor parted ways with the company in 2008 and that it cooperated with federal investigations. Red River did not respond to an FCW request for comment.
 
The Red River contracts in question appear to have been awarded between 2003 and 2008. According to public documents, Red River agreed to obtain Sun Microsystems service support coverage for certain server boards, but did not arrange with Sun to obtain all of the requested service coverage despite being paid to do so. It also agreed to provide Cisco SMARTNet for the Army in a 2005 contract, but did not complete registration of the service with Cisco and subsequently obtained a partial refund without reimbursing the Army.
 
The company also agreed in contracts in 2004 and 2006 to provide Sun software support for the Navy, but did not arrange for Sun to provide the service despite being paid to do so. And it greed to provide Panasonic-branded memory for use in computers, but provided third-party memory without advising the appropriate government customers of this product substitution. The Valley News reported that Taylor pocketed $150,000 from this scheme alone, which reportedly involved Panasonic ToughBooks that deployed troops frequently use in Afghanistan.
 

Source: FCW (http://s.tt/1gZ7C)

Obama Plan: What Do Small-Business Advocates Think?

News

Obama Plan: What Do Small-Business Advocates Think?

By Janean Chun
Huffington Post
October 9, 1600

Is President Obama's announcement that he plans to consolidate the Small Business Administration with five other government offices into one agency and to elevate the SBA Administrator to a Cabinet-level position good news or bad news for small business? It may be too early to tell, but several small-business advocacy groups and associations did weigh in with some immediate reactions. Here are excerpts of what they had to say, starting with the SBA administrator herself:

Karen Mills, Administrator, Small Business Administration

"Today was an important day for America's small businesses. President Obama asked Congress for the authority to reorganize and modernize government and he elevated my position as the SBA Administrator to Cabinet-level status.

"These actions are a reflection of the importance he places on small business, economic growth, and job creation.

"He asked Congress for the authority that Presidents from Hoover to Reagan have had to reorganize and modernize the federal government. This authority lapsed in 1984, but, today, the federal government needs to be updated to ensure that it meets the demands of entrepreneurs and small business owners in the 21st century.

"The President’s first proposal under this authority would be to create a unified department focused on economic growth and job creation, so that we can be more effective at helping businesses do what they do best –- create jobs.

"For the entrepreneurs and small business owners that SBA and other agencies serve, this is very good news. A more integrated approach would ensure that small businesses would have access to all of the federal government’s programs in a more seamless, coordinated, and coherent way."

Susan Eckerly, Senior Vice President of Federal Public Policy, National Federation of Independent Business

"Despite the President's lip service to small businesses in announcing his plan, it is unlikely to help job creators in any meaningful way. If the President really wants to help small businesses succeed, he can start by shrinking the agencies most responsible for standing in the way of their growth, such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Labor. Unfortunately, the President has consistently opposed meaningful regulatory reform, and we are skeptical that his plan to shrink the government will help tear down regulatory obstacles his agencies continue to impose.”

Steve Caldeira, President and CEO, International Franchise Association

"Today's announcement by President Obama to elevate SBA Administrator Karen Mills to a Cabinet-level position serves as a stamp of approval for her diligent and proven work to improve small business access to credit during a still very-challenging economic and public policy environment. Small business access to credit is the number one challenge facing prospective and existing franchisees and any steps that will enhance small business access to credit will help to boost our economy and create the jobs our country so desperately needs.

"While details of the proposed changes to the SBA and other government agencies are still unclear, under the leadership of Administrator Mills, the SBA has been a lifeline to the franchise community that has had difficulty acquiring loans in the commercial lending market during the economic downturn, increasing lending to record levels and reducing lender paperwork for SBA loans. With franchise small businesses poised for modest growth of 2.0 percent in 2012, access to capital, particularly through the SBA's 7(a) lending program, will be critical to achieving our forecasted growth."

"As part of any proposed reorganization, it would be essential that SBA loan programs remain intact and at their current funding levels, to ensure franchise small businesses can continue to access capital through these successful loan programs."

Todd McCracken, President and CEO, National Small Business Association

"While NSBA is firmly committed to reducing the deficit, there simply aren't enough details available yet to know if this will be a net win or loss for small business.

"On the one hand, reorganizing federal agencies to create a 'one-stop-shop' for America's small businesses could streamline processes and make accessing information and assistance much easier. On the other hand, such a reorganization could minimize the emphasis placed on small business by the federal government and lead to an even greater imbalance toward promoting the interests of large businesses over those of small business.

"Any proposal to consolidate agencies must ensure that SBA, Ex-Im Bank, OPIC, USTR and USTDA remain thriving vehicles for the U.S. to promote entrepreneurship. Anything short of that would be a disservice to America's small businesses and the U.S. economy."

Lloyd Chapman, President, American Small Business League

"I've been predicting this for years. It has nothing to do with shrinking government but has everything to do with eliminating contracting programs for small businesses. When was last time you heard of a U.S. President holding a press conference to talk about saving $3 billion over a decade? $3 billion is nothing compared to what the Pentagon will spend this year alone. It's an amount not even worth mentioning and definitely not worth dismantling the only agency to assist America's 28 million small businesses."