SBA Faulted for Role in Blackwater Security Guard Scandal

News

SBA Faulted for Role in Blackwater Security Guard Scandal

By Keith Girard
AllBusiness.com
October 9, 7600

After its guards were accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians without provocation last fall, Blackwater Worldwide, the security company responsible for protecting U.S. diplomats in that war-torn country, shifted its responsibility for the incident to an unlikely government agency -- the federal Small Business Administration.

Blackwater claimed the guards were not under its control because they were "independent contractors" and had been certified as such by the SBA. But a new report by the SBA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) says that Blackwater may have incorrectly categorized many of its security personnel as "independent contractors" to win more than $100 million in government contracts earmarked for small companies.

"During Fiscal Years 2005 through 2007, Blackwater or an affiliated company obtained a total of 39 contracts that were set aside for small businesses even though the bidder may not have met SBA's criteria to be considered a small business," the OIG report concluded. It referred the matter back to the SBA for further action.

The report, released this week, is the latest in a long series of investigations that have revealed large corporations on the receiving end of hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts that are supposed to go to small firms. Mismanagement and lack of accountability at the troubled agency have been a persistent part of the problem. And that was also the case here.

The OIG investigators said the SBA did not adequately explain its reasons for concluding that Blackwater security personnel were independent. It also said the SBA "did not follow up on or attempt to reconcile conflicting information in its files that the total number of Blackwater employees -- even excluding the security personnel hired under federal contracts -- exceeded the applicable size standard."

While the SBA has been down this road before, this is the first time a possible contractor miscertification has put the agency in the middle of a much broader controversy. Besides using the SBA to deny responsibility in the Iraqi shootings, Blackwater has used its "small business" certification to avoid paying $31.8 million in federal taxes, according to Congressional investigators.

Last March, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) warned Blackwater that the company's classification of a security guard as an independent contractor was "without merit." In response, Blackwater cited what it said was an SBA "official finding" that "Blackwater security contractors are not employees."

The situation incensed lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, asked the Labor Department, the IRS, and the SBA's OIG to investigate whether Blackwater defrauded the government of tax revenue and violated labor laws. The OIG's report is the first to be released.

"The SBA should not be involved in tax-related decisions," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who chairs the Senate small business committee. "The SBA must explain to the American people what role they may have played in helping Blackwater avoid paying $31.8 million in taxes."

Blackwater argued that about 1,000 of its security personnel, who serve under the State Department's $1.2 billion Worldwide Personal Protective Service (WPPS) contract, were independent contractors, not full-time employees. In fact, "Blackwater was considered to be the employer of the security personnel on the WPPS [contract]," which directly contradicts the SBA finding, the OIG report noted.

In response to the findings, Blackwater spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell said in a statement that "expert accounting and outside legal counsel have determined that Blackwater's classification of security personnel as independent contractors is reasonable, correct, and legally protected."

Fay Ott, associate administrator of Government Contracting and Business Development at the SBA, said in a letter to Rep. Waxman that the OIG report amounted to "guesswork" and that the OIG auditor could not reach a firm conclusion that the SBA did anything wrong.

The OIG focused on contracts awarded from fiscal years 2005 through 2007. During that time, Blackwater and its affiliates won 32 small business contracts worth more than $2.1 million. The work was supposed to be restricted to companies with revenue of $6.5 million or less, according to the audit.

One Blackwater contract had a revenue ceiling of $750,000, and its airline affiliate, Presidential Airways, won more than $107 million in contracts set aside for companies with revenues of less than $25.5 million or fewer than 1,500 employees. Blackwater, however, claims it will have revenues in excess of $1 billion annually by 2010.

Lloyd Chapman, president and founder of the American Small Business League (ASBL), which has tracked the SBA contracting controversy for more than six years, said Blackwater may have received closer to $1 billion in federal small business contracts between 2004 and 2008. Based on his own review of a federal contract database, contracts went to Blackwater Security Consulting, Blackwater Lodge & Training, and Blackwater Target Systems.

The latest report puts the ball back in the hands of lawmakers. According to a Waxman committee memorandum, the OIG report raises serious concerns about whether Blackwater made false statements about its small business status to win government contracts.

Under the Small Business Act, which established the SBA and many of its programs, misrepresenting an enterprise as a "small business concern" to win a federal contract is a criminal offense punishable by a $500,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.

The act also states that a company found to have made false statements is "subject to suspension and debarment. No company has ever been prosecuted or debarred during the Bush administration's term in office. It's time to enforce the law.

 

Small business advocate sues SBA for withholding contracting data

News

Small business advocate sues SBA for withholding contracting data

By ELISE CASTELLI
Federal Times
October 9, 7600

A small business association is suing the Small Business Administration for refusing to release the names of big businesses that received federal contracts intended for small businesses in 2005 and 2006.
The American Small Business League filed its suit in the U.S. District Court for Northern California on Wednesday. The lawsuit claims SBA violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by refusing to release the names of Fortune 1,000 firms that were counted as small businesses.
News reports have shown giant corporations like Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Rolls-Royce have received small business contracting dollars after purchasing small firms with pre-existing government contracts. Until the rules changed in June, those firms were not required to change the status of those subsidiaries, meaning agencies could still count money spent on those contracts toward their goals to award 23 percent of contract dollars to small businesses.
“I want people to know that when the government diverts $100 billion a year in contracts from middle-class America, there is a staggering negative economic impact,” said Lloyd Chapman, American Small Business League president.
In refusing Chapman’s FOIA request for the names last year, SBA told him the information was not available because it wasn’t tracked in that way. However, in November SBA put out a list of the top 100 contractors getting small business dollars, which flagged large businesses on the list.
SBA spokesman Michael Stamler said he was not aware of the lawsuit, but that the information the organization is seeking is available on two public Web sites: www.fpds.gov and USASpending.gov.
In court documents, the American Small Business League said the Web sites were inadequate because they do not identify the specific contracts SBA used to compile either its top 100 list or annual small business goaling reports.
The association said it intends to file similar lawsuits against the General Services Administration and the Defense Department.
Source: http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=3359565

60 percent of small-business contracts go to large firms, analysis finds

News

60 percent of small-business contracts go to large firms, analysis finds

By Sarah Chacko
Federal Times
October 9, 7200

Of the top 100 firms awarded small-business contracts in fiscal 2010, 61 were large businesses or owned by large companies, according to an analysis by the American Small Business League.

The 61 firms received more than $8 billion, or nearly 60 percent, of the $14 billion that went to the top 100 companies, ASBL reports.

The ASBL's analysis, released Tuesday, comes days after the Small Business Administration's June 27 announcement that the federal government is close to its congressionally mandated 23 percent small-business contracting goal. In 2010, agencies awarded 22.7 percent, or $98 billion, of federal contract dollars to small businesses, SBA said.

ASBL concludes, however, that the government actually spent 5 percent of its total contract dollars on small businesses in 2010.

SBA has not responded directly to ASBL's analysis. But SBA checks agencies' contract data at the end of each fiscal year and alerts them to any errors that show contracts were given to companies that do not meet small-business standards, said Michele Chang, a senior adviser in SBA's Office of Government Contracting and Business Development.

Small-business contracts sometimes show up as being awarded to large businesses because of contracting officer errors or because the company grows into a large business after the award of the contract, Chang said.

Agency contracting officers might mistakenly miscode a large business as small when they report contracts in the federal procurement database or they may not verify that a company's information in the contractor registry is correct, she said.

Errors also occur when a small business fails to report its merger with a large company or if the contracting officer does not change the company's information in the federal procurement database, Chang said.

ASBL spokesman Chris Gunn said the problem cannot be generalized that easily.

"While there are problems with the acquisition process that allow companies to appear small when in reality they are large, other times we're looking at outright fraud and abuse," he said.

Contracting officers must do more to ensure small-business contracts go to companies that legitimately meet the size standards, Gunn said.

Obama back-tracks on small business policies

News

Obama back-tracks on small business policies

Obama and Democrats poised to pass new loophole in federal contracting law that will allow our nation's wealthiest investors to receive billions of dollars in federal small business contracts

By Lloyd Chapman
Spero News
October 9, 7200

Considering the dire state of our nation's economy, President-electBarack Obamawas expected to support existing federal small business programs and propose new policies that would stimulate the middle class economy and create jobs for our nation's 27 million small businesses.

There appears to be a significant disconnection between President-elect Obama's campaign promises to American small businesses and the actual policies he is proposing.

In February, Obama released the following statement, "Over half of all Americans work for a small business. Small businesses are the backbone of our nation's economy and we must protect this great resource. It is time to end the diversion of federal small business contracts to corporate giants." (link)

Any mention of President-elect Obama's February statement, or specific plans to stop the flow of federal small business contracts to "corporate giants" are conspicuously absent from the Obama-Biden Transition Team website, www.change.gov.

Change.gov and the Obama-Biden campaign website, www.barackobama.com, significantly minimize the importance of our nation's small businesses, which employ more than 50 percent of all Americans.

Less important topics such as "Rural" and "Service" received major headings under the issues section of the Obama-Biden campaign website while issues relating to America's small businesses, which create over 80 percent of all new jobs were relegated to the site's lower priority people section between "Seniors" and "Sportsmen." (link)

The American Small Business League (ASBL) is predicting the Obama Administration may be preparing to roll out policies and legislation that could have a severe negative impact on the small businesses he acknowledged were the "backbone of our nation's economy."

From January 2001 to October 2008, Obama received more than $1 million in campaign contributions from the venture capital industry, according to Maplight.org. The site also indicates that the venture capital industry contributed heavily to senior Democratic leadership. (link)

The ASBL predicts President-elect Obama will support H.R. 3567, the Small Business Investment Expansion Act of 2007, which will create a new loophole in federal contracting law that will allow our nation's wealthiest investors to receive billions of dollars in federal small business contracts. The venture capital industry has spent millions of dollars lobbying Democratic leaders, including House SpeakerNancy Pelosi, to have the legislation passed.

I predict President-elect Obama will not restore the Small Business Administration's budget and staffing as he promised during the campaign. I don't think he will do anything to stop Fortune 500 firms from receiving federal small business contracts. I believe he will sign legislation to create another colossal loophole that will divert billions more in federal small business contracts to billionaire venture capitalists. People need to start noticing the dramatic difference between what Obama said during the campaign and what he is actually doing.

Lloyd Chapman is chairman of the American Small Business League.

Source:  http://www.speroforum.com/


When Small Businesses Lose to Big Companies

News

When Small Businesses Lose to Big Companies

By Lloyd Chapman
New York Times
October 9, 7200

To the Editor:

Re “The Small Business Administration’s Comeback,” by Jovita Carranza, the acting administrator of the Small Business Administration (letter, The New York Times on the Web, June 19):

I would suggest that Ms. Carranza check out the reports from the S.B.A.’s own inspector general.

In 2005, the inspector general released three reports, which found that the S.B.A. was reporting awards to large corporations toward the small-business procurement goal, that large businesses were improperly getting federal small-business contracts and that the diversion of federal small-business contracts to large corporations was one of the biggest challenges facing the S.B.A. and the entire federal government today.

Since 2002, there has been a series of federal investigations that have all found that the S.B.A. has allowed some of the largest corporations in the world to get federal small-business contracts.

It is disappointing to see Ms. Carranza continue the Bush administration’s trend of muddying the water around the diversion of billions of dollars in federal small-business contracts to large corporations.

We believe that President Bush will take one last shot at dismantling federal small business programs before he leaves office by changing the definition of a small business to include companies that have no business anywhere near federal small-business programs.

Lloyd Chapman
President
American Small Business League
Petaluma, Calif., June 19, 2008


Source:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/opinion/lweb25sba.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

Related Article: 

Small-Business Agency’s Problems Linger as Leader Moves on to HUD (June 12, 2008)