Minority firms getting few Katrina contracts

News

Minority firms getting few Katrina contracts

Associated Press
October 9, 5600

WASHINGTON - The Government Accountability Office is looking into whether small and minority-owned businesses have been given a fair opportunity to compete for the contracts.

Minority-owned businesses say they're paying the price for the decision by Congress and the Bush administration to waive certain rules for Hurricane Katrina recovery contracts.

About one-point-five percent of the one-point-six (b) billion awarded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency has gone to minority businesses, less than a third of the five percent normally required.

Once Katrina's destructive waters receded, Andrew Jenkins began making calls in hopes of winning a government contract for his Mississippi construction company.

Jenkins, who is black, says he watched in frustration as the contracts went to others, many of them larger, white-owned companies with political ties to Washington.

To speed aid, many requirements normally attached to government contracting were waived by Congress and the administration. The result has been far more no-bid contracts going to businesses that have an existing relationship with the government.




Minority firms get few contracts

News

Minority firms get few contracts

Two lawmakers are asking whether small and minority-owned businesses have been given a fair chance to compete for contracts

By Hope Yen
Associated Press
October 9, 5600

WASHINGTON - Minority-owned businesses say they're paying the price for the decision by Congress and the Bush administration to waive certain rules for Hurricane Katrina recovery contracts.

About 1.5 percent of the $1.6 billion awarded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency has gone to minority businesses, less than a third of the 5 percent normally required.

On Tuesday, Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, and Rep. Donald A. Manzullo, R-Ill., asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate whether small and minority-owned businesses have been given a fair opportunity to compete for Katrina contracts.

Andrew Jenkins doesn't think so.

Once Katrina's destructive waters receded, he began making calls in hopes of winning a government contract for his Mississippi construction company.

Jenkins, who is black, says he watched in frustration as the contracts went to others, many of them larger, white-owned companies with political ties to Washington.

''That just doesn't smell right,'' said Jenkins, president of AJA Management and Technical Services of Jackson, Miss., noting the region has a higher percentage of blacks and minority-owned businesses than other areas of the country.

To speed aid, many requirements normally attached to government contracting were waived by Congress and the administration. The result has been far more no-bid contracts going to businesses that have an existing relationship with the government.

There also was an easing of affirmative action rules for contractors and a suspension of a ''prevailing wage'' law .

''It sends a bad message,'' said Harry Alford, president of the National Black Chamber of Commerce. 'What they're basically saying to the minority in New Orleans is, `We'll make it harder for you to find a job. And if you do, we'll make sure you get paid less.' ''

The Department of Homeland Security, whose FEMA division handles most of the contracts, said it is committed to hiring smaller, disadvantaged firms. But many of the no-bid awards were given out to known players who could quickly provide help in an emergency situation, spokesman Larry Orluskie said.

''It was about saving lives, protecting property and going to who you go to, to get what you need,'' he said.

At a recent meeting in Mississippi for minority business people with federal contracting officials, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said many of the 100 owners walked out in anger when told their best chance of getting work was to seek smaller subcontracts from the larger companies.

The larger companies include Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton Co., which Vice President Dick Cheney headed from 1995 to 2000; and AshBritt, a Pompano Beach company with ties to Mississippi's governor, Haley Barbour, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee.

The Army Corps of Engineers has a better record on minority contracts, with roughly 16 percent of the $637 million in Katrina contracts going to minority-owned companies, according to agency records.





Being a Voice For Small Business

News

Being a Voice For Small Business

Petaluma resident Lloyd Chapman founded the American Small Business League in an effort to ensure small companies benefit from government programs designed to help them

By Ted Gross
Petaluma Argus-Courier
October 9, 5600

When Lloyd Chapman received a call from a Dallas newspaper reporter in 1991, warning him to be careful, he dismissed it as a crank call. When the reporter flew to California a few days later to warn him in person, he took it more seriously.

Chapman was engaged at the time in a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense, and the stakes were high. He was pushing to have top-secret Pentagon information made public, based on his suspicion that billions of dollars in government contracts, earmarked for small business programs, were being awarded to large corporations.

"The reporter reminded me that I was interfering with an $80 billion military contract," he said. "He said he'd heard some things, and he brought up the movie 'Silkwood'."

A short time later, Chapman said, he got an ominous phone call from a stranger. "The guy was very calm and he spoke in measured tones. He told me I was going to get hurt if I didn't drop the suit."

Chapman hung up the phone, considered the situation, and ultimately changed only one thing: he began parking closer to his Novato office building.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in his favor and the Pentagon was forced to make its military contract information public for the first time.

But according to Chapman, this landmark decision, which should have paved the way for small businesses to win substantial government contracts, was stifled by the efforts of the Small Business Administration (SBA).

"Congress specifically set this money aside for small business," he said, "but the SBA established loophole after loophole. You've had Fortune 500 companies getting contracts by disguising themselves as small businesses. Ninety-eight percent of the small businesses in America employ less than 100 people, yet the SBA's basic standard for many industries is 500 employees, and often more."

According to the SBA, a single-employee operation that manufactures pine benches is a small business, but so are a fiber optic company with 1,000 employees, a telecommunications company with 1,500 employees and an international trade finance company with $150 million in assets.

Chapman became increasingly frustrated by the SBA throughout the 1990s, often taking his concerns to Washington, and finally left his job in the microcomputer industry to establish the American Small Business League in 2002, right here in Petaluma.

He crusades tirelessly out of his Cypress Drive office, up to 14 hours a day, to ensure small businesses actually benefit from the government programs designed to help them.

So far, he has been successful in getting nearly 600 corporations removed from the government's database of small business contractors and is in the midst of a heated campaign, in which Sen. John Kerry has become involved, to re-define a small business as one with 100 employees or less.

"I testified before Congress," he said. "It was a five-hour hearing. I got to talk for seven minutes. The other five hours 23 minutes, they let the SBA lawyers talk. I got so angry, I held up a government document showing AT&T on their list of small business contractors. The chairman asked the SBA lawyer about this, and the lawyer said it was a computer glitch.

"I watched a federal employee lie to Congress," he said. "Get ready, because I'm gonna clean this stuff up."

The case of Stanley Pond, an engineer in Berthoud, Colo., is reflective of what Chapman sees as widespread abuse of the contract awards system. In 2001, Pond and his two employees developed a custom temperature calibration instrument for the Air Force, only to lose the bid to a large Ohio corporation.

"I was the only small business in the country that made this instrument," said Pond. "Their corporation used three layers to disguise itself. It was a joint venture, where this huge organization used a small local company as a rep. The SBA never even examined their facilities."

Pond, after being denied an appeal hearing, filed a complaint with the SBA Inspector General's office. Two years later, the office concluded the Ohio company should have been ineligible for the contract.

"That, and a buck and a quarter, will buy me a soda pop at a vending machine," said Pond, who estimates he sunk $100,000 into developing his product.

Chapman is sympathetic but not surprised. He recalls an incident years ago in Texas, where he got his first taste of common sense prevailing over government bureaucracy.

"I worked for the state controller," he said. "They were going to bring in a bunch of outside 'specialists' to figure out how to save money. I asked: why bring in strangers when you've got people who've been working here 20 years? The first idea came from a handyman who said all state employees should fill their rental cars before returning them. All told, we saved a million dollars that first year."

Chapman attributes his fighting spirit to his Texas upbringing in the 1950s.

"On TV you had Superman, Gene Autry, Hopalong Cassidy and Roy Rogers," he said. "The good guy always won. In that culture, at that time, the good guys always beat the bad guys."





Letter to the Editor: Obama's Policies are Bad for Small Business

News

Letter to the Editor: Obama's Policies are Bad for Small Business

By Lloyd Chapman
Federal Times
October 9, 5200

Bad for small business

For more than three years, I have been predicting that President Obama would try to close the Small Business Administration by combining it with the Commerce Department, and now he has announced his plans to do exactly that. ["Push to reorganize agencies draws concern in Congress," Jan. 23]

The president is trying to wind down federal small-business programs, not "streamline" government.

If he really wanted to shrink government, he would start by cutting big agencies like the Pentagon, not some of the smallest agencies. The $3 billion over 10 years the consolidation will save is equal to 0.05 percent of the $6 trillion the Pentagon is projected to spend in the next decade.

The interests of large businesses and small businesses are diametrically opposed. Merging Commerce with SBA is like merging al-Qaida with the Department of Homeland Security. Commerce pushes the interests of Fortune 500 firms and works closely with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, while SBA is designed to help small businesses.

Obama has adopted a pattern of anti-small business policies since taking office:

• On Sept. 9, his administration announced plans in the Federal Register to eliminate a Defense Department program that is the nation's oldest and most successful in directing federal infrastructure spending to minorities.

• His administration removed the parent company's DUNS number from the Central Contractor Database, making it easier for corporations to misrepresent their subsidiaries as small businesses.

• He has not kept his campaign promise to end the diversion of federal small-business contracts to corporate giants. Latest data of the top 100 federal small-business contractors shows 60 were some of the world's largest companies.

• He has not kept his campaign promise to restore SBA's budget to pre-George W. Bush administration levels.

• In December, he reauthorized loopholes that allow large defense firms to circumvent the Small Business Act by not reporting their subcontracting performance.

When you quit listening to what he says and start watching what he does, you'll see that President Obama is one of the most anti-small business presidents in U.S. history.

— Lloyd Chapman, president and founder, American Small Business League, Petaluma, Calif.

Real Change: New President Gets VC

News

Real Change: New President Gets VC

Barack Obama has an affinity for venture capital that dates back to his days as a state senator

By Brad Spirrison
VCJ: Venture Capital Journal
October 9, 5200

Steven Lazarus had just sat down after accepting a lifetime achievement award from the Illinois Venture Capital Association when he was approached by an up-and-coming state senator with an unforgettable name.

It was December 2003 and Barack Obama—who was in the middle of an uphill battle for the U.S. Senate—decided that the most important place to be was the IVCA’s annual awards dinner.

“He came over, pulled out a chair, and spent the next half hour interrogating me on the subject [of venture capital],” recalls Lazarus, co-founder of Arch Venture Partners. “He asked very tough questions. He showed a deep curiosity about the whole process of venture investing and developing technology ideas into businesses.”

Obama may very well be the first U.S. president who actually understands—and appreciates—the role of venture capital. A number of VCs worked on his presidential campaign and on his transition team—and as of early January he had rewarded two of them with plumb jobs. He chose Julius Genachowski of Rock Creek Ventures to be head of the Federal Communications Commission and Karen Gordon Mills of Solera Capital to run the Small Business Administration.

And in what could be a boon for the entire venture industry, Obama has repeatedly spoken about the need for a $150 billion green energy program to stimulate and remake the U.S. economy.

Venture capitalists who know Obama from his days as a state senator say he has a favorable view of the industry. For example, he sponsored legislation in 2003 that was aimed at stimulating early stage investing in Illinois. That bill eventually led to the allocation of $75 million to be invested in about 20 venture firms via the Illinois Technology Development Account (TDA). Among the firms that count the TDA as a limited partner today are DFJ Portage Venture Partners, Duchossois Technology Partners and OCA Ventures.

“He was very helpful because the way the [TDA] fund was originally proposed, in our view, was more of a pork barrel activity than a venture capital activity,” says Steve Beitler, managing director of TDA-sponsored Dunrath Capital.

 

Beitler, who raised money for Obama while serving as chairman of the Illinois Venture Capital Association, says the future president favored the state working with professional managers rather than making direct investments in startups. “We were able to craft legislation he introduced that produced a structure for a fund that was more appropriate to steward the government’s money,” he notes.

The TDA still exists and efforts are underway by Illinois Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias (an Obama fund-raiser and pickup basketball teammate) to triple its funding to $225 million, or 3% of the state’s investment portfolio.

“The time the venture capital industry invested in [Obama] was well spent,” says Dan Shomon, a key aid to Obama in the Illinois state senate. “Now they have somebody in the White House who, while not a knee-jerk supporter, understands their issues.”

En route to the presidency, Obama often signaled his intention to work with VCs to address national problems. Cleantech appears to be the sector where the Obama team will most closely collaborate with the venture industry. During the campaign, Obama repeatedly spoke of his desire to use venture capital as part of a proposed $150 billion green energy program. In addition, he proposed the creation of a $10 billion “Clean Technologies Deployment Venture Capital Fund” back in November 2007.

While the administration has been light on specifics so far, the venture industry welcomes attention to the sector.

“The [Obama] transition team recognizes that venture capital plays an important role in new job creation,” says Ray Lane, a managing partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers who has met with Obama’s transition team.

Lane believes the administration’s relationship with the venture industry will be centered around project selection. “It will be all about the companies that are funded,” he says, adding that government intervention in the cleantech space will likely come in the form of tax incentives, loan guarantees and purchasing mandates. While portfolio companies will benefit, Lane sees “no thesis” for the federal government directly supporting firms that target clean technology industries.

 

Shortly before the election, Lazarus and Bob Nelson of Arch Venture Partners spoke with Austan Goolsbee, Obama’s key economic advisor, about the role of venture capital in addressing cleantech issues.

“There’s going to be a role for the government to increase the funding for breakthrough ideas and bridge the gap for companies at universities and national labs that don’t have venture funding yet,” says Nelson, a lifelong Republican who moved across the aisle to raise money for Obama. “We are not going to solve these problems through incremental technology, but by using the leverage of the government early on to incentivize the private sector to take bigger risks.”

National Venture Capital Association President Mark Heesen is encouraged with Obama’s choice of Stephen Chu as Energy Secretary, noting that Chu is committed to supporting basic R&D initiatives. Chu, director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is well known in venture capital circles and has spoken at a number of cleantech gatherings.

From a political perspective, it will behoove the Obama administration to target cleantech companies and sectors that can deliver the most immediate payoff.

“He’ll place an emphasis on the kinds of research and projects that have a short ramp to market acceptance,” predicts David Wilhelm, a partner with Hopewell Ventures and a frequent surrogate for Obama during the campaign. “I take Obama very seriously when he says he intends to allocate $10 billion to venture-related activities in the field of alternative energy.”

At the end of Bill Clinton’s presidency, Wilhelm was involved in the creation of the New Markets Venture Capital program at the SBA. That program, which died in 2002, provided dollar-for-dollar matching funds of investment capital and grants raised by companies that were based in poor areas. Wilhelm believes elements from this program deserve a “second look” under Obama.

“We need to explore every possible idea to take advantage of the renewable energy moment,” he says.

 

Only time will tell if Obama will turn out to be the VC President his venture capital supporters hope he’ll be. In the meantime, VCs like Lazarus of Arch Venture Partners will have to be content with the amazing stories they can now tell their grandkids about their personal meetings with the 44th president.

 

--

A week before his inauguration, Barack Obama chose Julius Genachowski, co-founder and managing director of Rock Creek Ventures, to lead the Federal Communications Commission.

Genchowski, who was a classmate of Obama’s at Harvard Law School, was the second VC to be named to a high-profile position by Obama. Since several other venture capitalists played key fund-raising and transition roles for the new president, it’s possible that other VC supporters could land important jobs in the Obama administration.

Before naming Genchowski as FCC chief, Obama chose Karen Gordon Mills, founding managing director of Solera Capital, to run the Small Business Administration. For decades, the SBA was a key player in the venture industry, matching limited partner commitments to eligible firms. It is unclear if Gordon Mills intends to restart the VC program after it was discontinued by the Bush administration. Contacted shortly before the inauguration, a spokesperson for the SBA said it was “premature” to speculate on how the SBA might change.

Other VCs with close ties to the Obama administration include Tom Wheeler of Core Capital Partners, who worked on the transition team, and Mark Gorenberg of Hummer Winblad Venture Partners and Ted Dintersmith of Charles River Ventures, both of whom helped Obama with fund-raising. —Brad Spirrison